Re: Retiring OpenShift v2 non-client packages from Fedora

2014-10-06 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
On 10/03/2014 10:51 PM, Haïkel wrote: 2014-10-03 22:30 GMT+02:00 Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com: On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 21:43 +0200, Haïkel wrote: This makes sense to me, though it annoys me as a token of our failure to be an attractive platform for such use cases. DId you consider

Retiring OpenShift v2 non-client packages from Fedora

2014-10-03 Thread Troy Dawson
OpenShift Origin release 4 no longer supports Fedora, only RHEL/SL/CentOS. The reason is that the ruby in Fedora has progressed so fast that it is no longer compatible with the code in OpenShift Origin. There is currently no plans to update the current code in OpenShift Origin to a newer ruby,

Re: Retiring OpenShift v2 non-client packages from Fedora

2014-10-03 Thread Haïkel
This makes sense to me, though it annoys me as a token of our failure to be an attractive platform for such use cases. DId you consider providing a copr repository ? Regards, H. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora

Re: Retiring OpenShift v2 non-client packages from Fedora

2014-10-03 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 21:43 +0200, Haïkel wrote: This makes sense to me, though it annoys me as a token of our failure to be an attractive platform for such use cases. DId you consider providing a copr repository ? A COPR repository probably wouldn't work, because they'd have to provide

Re: Retiring OpenShift v2 non-client packages from Fedora

2014-10-03 Thread Haïkel
2014-10-03 22:30 GMT+02:00 Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com: On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 21:43 +0200, Haïkel wrote: This makes sense to me, though it annoys me as a token of our failure to be an attractive platform for such use cases. DId you consider providing a copr repository ? A COPR