----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/44/#review66 -----------------------------------------------------------
Does this work with ilgiz's update_sync code? Is anything other than the display code relying on having the URL? ie, what else could break by suddenly changing the update url during sync? - Tim Flink On Aug. 12, 2013, 12:57 p.m., Martin Krizek wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/44/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Aug. 12, 2013, 12:57 p.m.) > > > Review request for blockerbugs. > > > Bugs: 386 > https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/386 > > > Repository: blockerbugs > > > Description > ------- > > commit be73d7514172ad122ec969b74a1bac37f14f28f4 > Author: Martin Krizek <mkri...@redhat.com> > Date: Mon Aug 12 14:52:39 2013 +0200 > > Update URLs should comtain the update ID when possible > > Fixes: #386 > > > Diffs > ----- > > blockerbugs/util/update_sync.py d664839ec1c5979dce980e7baad58154f4622e11 > > Diff: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/44/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Run sync without the fix to fetch urls with title in them. Then I run sync > with the fix, the sync process updated the urls to contain updateid instead > of title. > > > Thanks, > > Martin Krizek > >
_______________________________________________ qa-devel mailing list qa-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
