Re: Review request for oclock package (orphaned since F35)

2023-05-14 Thread Globe Trotter via devel
Kevin, oclock was not updated, and Beson's email made me realize that I could go an do it myself. I did that by the time you check. slim's was updated and both packages are now in testing. Best, Ranjan On Sunday, May 14, 2023 at 10:49:44 AM CDT, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Sun, May 14,

Re: Review request for oclock package (orphaned since F35)

2023-05-14 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, May 14, 2023 at 02:04:57PM +0300, Benson Muite wrote: > Ranjan, > > On 5/14/23 13:46, Globe Trotter via devel wrote: > > Thanks! The package was cleared  on BZ some time ago. Is there some > > additional review that is needed? > > > Sorry, that is correct. Usually state is set to post.

Re: Review request for oclock package (orphaned since F35)

2023-05-14 Thread Benson Muite
Ranjan, On 5/14/23 13:46, Globe Trotter via devel wrote: > Thanks! The package was cleared  on BZ some time ago. Is there some > additional review that is needed? > Sorry, that is correct. Usually state is set to post. It seems to have been unretired: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11417

Re: Review request for oclock package (orphaned since F35)

2023-05-14 Thread Sandro
On 14-05-2023 12:40, Benson Muite wrote: It seems it is just the review that is needed: The re-review is done: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2025138 Releng unretiring the package is the next step, really. -- Sandro ___ devel mailing

Re: Review request for oclock package (orphaned since F35)

2023-05-14 Thread Globe Trotter via devel
Benson, Thanks! The package was cleared  on BZ some time ago. Is there some additional review that is needed? Best wishes, Ranjan On Sunday, May 14, 2023 at 05:41:35 AM CDT, Benson Muite wrote: Hi Ranjan, Thanks for contributing to Fedora and maintaining packages. On 5/14/23 03:27,

Re: Review request for oclock package (orphaned since F35)

2023-05-14 Thread Sandro
On 14-05-2023 00:45, Globe Trotter via devel wrote: Thanks, Sandro! How does one ping in the ticket on paguire? The easiest way is to just leave a comment in the ticket. If you need info from a specific person you would tag that person (@fas_user). That ensures people watching the ticket

Re: Review request for oclock package (orphaned since F35)

2023-05-14 Thread Benson Muite
Hi Ranjan, Thanks for contributing to Fedora and maintaining packages. On 5/14/23 03:27, Globe Trotter via devel wrote: > Thanks, Kevin! No  problem, no rush, I did not quite know what to expect, > hence the questions. Thanks again! > > It seems it is just the review that is needed:

Re: Review request for oclock package (orphaned since F35)

2023-05-13 Thread Globe Trotter via devel
Thanks, Kevin! No  problem, no rush, I did not quite know what to expect, hence the questions. Thanks again! On Saturday, May 13, 2023 at 06:12:33 PM CDT, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 02:41:10AM +0200, Sandro wrote: > On 11-05-2023 17:57, Globe Trotter via devel

Re: Review request for oclock package (orphaned since F35)

2023-05-13 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 02:41:10AM +0200, Sandro wrote: > On 11-05-2023 17:57, Globe Trotter via devel wrote: > > Still no movement on my unretire requests for both slim and oclock, not > > even a request for additional information. > > Tags have been added to the ticket. So, it has come up in

Re: Review request for oclock package (orphaned since F35)

2023-05-13 Thread Globe Trotter via devel
Thanks, Sandro! How does one ping in the ticket on paguire? On Friday, May 12, 2023 at 07:41:47 PM CDT, Sandro wrote: On 11-05-2023 17:57, Globe Trotter via devel wrote: > Still no movement on my unretire requests for both slim and oclock, not even > a request for additional

Re: Review request for oclock package (orphaned since F35)

2023-05-12 Thread Sandro
On 11-05-2023 17:57, Globe Trotter via devel wrote: Still no movement on my unretire requests for both slim and oclock, not even a request for additional information. Tags have been added to the ticket. So, it has come up in one of the meetings. Supposedly, no-one has found the time yet to

Re: Review request for oclock package (orphaned since F35)

2023-05-11 Thread Globe Trotter via devel
Still no movement on my unretire requests for both slim and oclock, not even a request for additional information. On Sunday, May 7, 2023 at 10:50:42 AM CDT, Sandro wrote: On 07-05-2023 17:34, Globe Trotter via devel wrote: > How long does it take to unretire a package? I was thinking

Re: Review request for oclock package (orphaned since F35)

2023-05-07 Thread Globe Trotter via devel
I see, thanks! I had indeed forgotten that the previous request had been closed. On Sunday, May 7, 2023 at 10:50:42 AM CDT, Sandro wrote: On 07-05-2023 17:34, Globe Trotter via devel wrote: > How long does it take to unretire a package? I was thinking that it > was automatic, but I have

Re: Review request for oclock package (orphaned since F35)

2023-05-07 Thread Sandro
On 07-05-2023 17:34, Globe Trotter via devel wrote: How long does it take to unretire a package? I was thinking that it was automatic, but I have not received any notification yet. Did this request last evening. I don't think it's fully automated. It's a member of the releng team that has to

Re: Review request for oclock package (orphaned since F35)

2023-05-07 Thread Globe Trotter via devel
How long does it take to unretire a package? I was thinking that it was automatic, but I have not received any notification yet. Did this request last evening. On Saturday, May 6, 2023 at 07:25:30 PM CDT, Globe Trotter via devel wrote: Thank you for this. I got: fedpkg import

Re: Review request for oclock package (orphaned since F35)

2023-05-06 Thread Globe Trotter via devel
Thank you for this. I got: fedpkg import ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/oclock-1.0.4-4.fc37.src.rpm Removing no longer used file: dead.package Could not execute import_srpm: This package or module is retired. The action has stopped. so I guess I have request unretirement. I thought I did it sometime ago, but

Re: Review request for oclock package (orphaned since F35)

2023-05-06 Thread Sandro
On 06-05-2023 23:43, Sandro wrote: On 06-05-2023 19:36, Globe Trotter via devel wrote: Can someone please review the oclock package? This was orphaned after F35, and I packaged it for myself, and then would like to put it up. It was tentatively approved, but never finally done so. Thanks!

Re: Review request for oclock package (orphaned since F35)

2023-05-06 Thread Sandro
On 06-05-2023 19:36, Globe Trotter via devel wrote: Can someone please review the oclock package? This was orphaned after F35, and I packaged it for myself, and then would like to put it up. It was tentatively approved, but never finally done so. Thanks! Looks like the package is approved. The

Re: Review request for oclock package (orphaned since F35)

2023-05-06 Thread Globe Trotter via devel
Sorry, forgot the BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2025138 On Saturday, May 6, 2023 at 12:36:20 PM CDT, Globe Trotter wrote: Can someone please review the oclock package? This was orphaned after F35, and I packaged it for myself, and then would like to put it up. It

Re: Review request for oclock package (orphaned since F35)

2023-05-06 Thread Globe Trotter via devel
Can someone please review the oclock package? This was orphaned after F35, and I packaged it for myself, and then would like to put it up. It was tentatively approved, but never finally done so. Thanks! On Tuesday, November 23, 2021 at 02:43:00 PM CST, Björn Persson wrote: Ben

Re: Review request for oclock package (orphaned since F35)

2021-12-02 Thread Dan Čermák
Hi, Globe Trotter via devel writes: > Thank you to Dan Čermák for reviewing this package. However, I had two > questions from his comments. The first was that the spec file should use > gpgverify. > So, I went to the suggested webpage: >

Re: Review request for oclock package (orphaned since F35)

2021-11-23 Thread Björn Persson
Ben Beasley wrote: > Please compare with > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xfontsel/blob/rawhide/f/xfontsel.spec, > paying close attention to the comments in the spec file. SKS keyservers have > gone offline since that package obtained its keyring, so try using > hkps://keys.openpgp.org

Re: Review request for oclock package (orphaned since F35)

2021-11-22 Thread Globe Trotter via devel
Wonderful, thank you! This is the sort of pointer I was looking for. I will now try it. On Monday, November 22, 2021, 07:05:13 PM CST, Ben Beasley wrote: Please compare with https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xfontsel/blob/rawhide/f/xfontsel.spec, paying close attention to the

Re: Review request for oclock package (orphaned since F35)

2021-11-22 Thread Ben Beasley
Please compare with https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xfontsel/blob/rawhide/f/xfontsel.spec, paying close attention to the comments in the spec file. SKS keyservers have gone offline since that package obtained its keyring, so try using hkps://keys.openpgp.org instead. That package also uses

Re: Review request for oclock package (orphaned since F35)

2021-11-22 Thread Globe Trotter via devel
Thank you to Dan Čermák for reviewing this package. However, I had two questions from his comments. The first was that the spec file should use gpgverify. So, I went to the suggested webpage: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_source_file_verification and did the

Review request for oclock package (orphaned since F35)

2021-11-22 Thread Globe Trotter via devel
Hello, Anyone willing to review this request for a recently (>8 weeks) orphaned package? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2025138 Happy to review in return. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Re: Review request for oclock package (orphaned since F35)

2021-11-20 Thread Globe Trotter via devel
Yes, indeed, stupid me. I neglected to post the bugzilla request. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2025138 Sorry. Best wishes, aa...@fedoraproject.org On Saturday, November 20, 2021, 03:16:50 AM CST, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at

Re: Review request for oclock package (orphaned since F35)

2021-11-20 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sat, 2021-11-20 at 04:46 +, Globe Trotter via devel wrote: > Hi, > > As the name says, this is a review request for the orphaned package > oclock. I find that the old spec file from F34 complies without errors > and so would like to maintain it.  But first, I need a review. Could > someone

Re: Review request for oclock package (orphaned since F35)

2021-11-20 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 04:46:17AM +, Globe Trotter via devel wrote: > Hi, > > As the name says, this is a review request for the orphaned package oclock. I > find that the old spec file from F34 complies without errors and so would > like to maintain it.  But first, I need a review. Could

Review request for oclock package (orphaned since F35)

2021-11-19 Thread Globe Trotter via devel
Hi, As the name says, this is a review request for the orphaned package oclock. I find that the old spec file from F34 complies without errors and so would like to maintain it.  But first, I need a review. Could someone please help review the package? Thanks, aa...@fedoraproject.org.