Dne 23.8.2016 v 20:11 Björn Esser napsal(a):
> Thanks you very much for the reviews! ^^
>
> We need a compat-pkg for rubygem-listen, I'm afraid… :(
Why?
Vít
>
>
> Am 23.08.2016 um 19:45 schrieb gil:
>> hi
>>
>> damm i dont know what happen!
>>
>> $ fedora-review -b 1368851 --plugins Ruby
Thanks you very much for the reviews! ^^
We need a compat-pkg for rubygem-listen, I'm afraid… :(
Am 23.08.2016 um 19:45 schrieb gil:
hi
damm i dont know what happen!
$ fedora-review -b 1368851 --plugins Ruby -m fedora-rawhide-i386 -L
/home/gil/deps
INFO: Processing bugzilla bug: 1368851
hi
damm i dont know what happen!
$ fedora-review -b 1368851 --plugins Ruby -m fedora-rawhide-i386 -L
/home/gil/deps
INFO: Processing bugzilla bug: 1368851
INFO: Getting .spec and .srpm Urls from : 1368851
INFO: --> SRPM url:
https://besser82.fedorapeople.org/review/jekyll/rubygem-jekyll-3.2
A'ighty! Took them… =)
Am 23.08.2016 um 16:37 schrieb gil:
Il 23/08/2016 16:14, Björn Esser ha scritto:
Hello folks,
I have some rubygem-packages open for review [1] for a proposed
change in Fedora 25 [2] and looking for someone to swap reviews with.
Cheers
Björn (besser82)
hi
tak
Il 23/08/2016 16:14, Björn Esser ha scritto:
Hello folks,
I have some rubygem-packages open for review [1] for a proposed change
in Fedora 25 [2] and looking for someone to swap reviews with.
Cheers
Björn (besser82)
hi
take:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368844
https://b
Hello folks,
I have some rubygem-packages open for review [1] for a proposed change
in Fedora 25 [2] and looking for someone to swap reviews with.
Cheers
Björn (besser82)
[1]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=1368851&hide_resolved=1
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wi
On 06/01/2016 09:49 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> I've got a handful of packages awaiting review, and am willing to swap
> for reviews with others. Take your pick:
> - gap-pkg-gbnp: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1340513
Taken. Can you please review btrfs-sxbackup:
https://bugzilla.redh
I've got a handful of packages awaiting review, and am willing to swap
for reviews with others. Take your pick:
- gap-pkg-resclasses: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336005
- gap-pkg-gbnp: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1340513
- gap-pkg-irredsol: https://bugzilla.redhat
On 6 May 2016 17:24, "Jerry James" wrote:
>
> I've got another small pile of GAP packages that need reviews. These
> are all pretty simple, and follow practices established for existing
> GAP packages. Let me know what I can review for you in exchange.
>
> - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.
I've got another small pile of GAP packages that need reviews. These
are all pretty simple, and follow practices established for existing
GAP packages. Let me know what I can review for you in exchange.
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332607: gap-pkg-scscp
- https://bugzilla.redha
Hi
catch
can you take this for me?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316196
thanks in advance
.g
Il 31/03/2016 23:48, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ha scritto:
Hi,
I'm looking for reviewers for:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322993
python-cma - Covariance Matrix Adaptat
Hi,
I'm looking for reviewers for:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322993
python-cma - Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy numerical optimizer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318873
neurord - Stochastic reaction-diffusion simulator
I'll be happy to review
Hi, Corey.
On Tuesday, 15 March 2016 at 15:39, Corey Sheldon wrote:
> On 03/15/2016 09:19 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I'm looking for reviewers for a couple of new packages:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082825
> Dominik,
>
>
> While I'm not a pac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/15/2016 09:19 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm looking for reviewers for a couple of new packages:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082825
> mozilla-lightbeam - An add-on for visualizing HTTP requests betwe
On 03/15/2016 09:19 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm looking for reviewers for a couple of new packages:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082825
Dominik,
While I'm not a packager, I am surely game for testing out some stuff
for you (partly to get myself famil
On Tuesday, 15 March 2016 at 14:32, Antonio Trande wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-03-15 at 14:19 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292040
> > tng - Trajectory Next Generation binary format manipulation library
> >
> >
>
> tng is already u
On Tue, 2016-03-15 at 14:19 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292040
> tng - Trajectory Next Generation binary format manipulation library
>
>
tng is already under review.
> Regards,
> Dominik
--
---
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitte
Hi!
I'm looking for reviewers for a couple of new packages:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082825
mozilla-lightbeam - An add-on for visualizing HTTP requests between
websites in real time
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1154750
mozilla-privacy-badger - Protects your priv
On 9 March 2016 at 00:52, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> I'm looking for reviewers for:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315871
> Library for building data processing pipelines for machine learning
Have taken this one. I don't have anything for you to review in
exchange, but
I'm looking for reviewers for:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315910
python-libarchive-c - Python interface to libarchive
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315912
diffoscope - In-depth comparison of files, archives, and directories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cg
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Greg Hellings wrote:
> I have three outstanding reviews that I'd like to push through so I
> can work out the next layer of my dependency tree. I'd be happy to
> swap reviews with someone. Links below:
>
> rubygem-async_sinatra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug
I have three outstanding reviews that I'd like to push through so I
can work out the next layer of my dependency tree. I'd be happy to
swap reviews with someone. Links below:
rubygem-async_sinatra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310873
rubygem-benchmark-ips https://bugzilla.redhat.com
R-inline
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305335 R-Rcpp
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305336 R-RInside
>
> There is a dependency chain: The 3rd depends on the first two, and
> the 4th depends on the 3rd.
>
> Review swaps welcome.
>
>
-RInside
There is a dependency chain: The 3rd depends on the first two, and the
4th depends on the 3rd.
Review swaps welcome.
Mattias
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel
Sorry for the noise
the right bug is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301589
.g
Il 26/01/2016 20:27, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
1) pgcenter - Top-like PostgreSQL statistics viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302053
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
h
hi
take!
can you take this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302053
for me?
thanks in advance
.g
Il 26/01/2016 20:27, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
1) pgcenter - Top-like PostgreSQL statistics viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302053
It should be quite simple.
--
dev
Hi!
I'll be happy swap reviews for 3 my packages:
1) pgcenter - Top-like PostgreSQL statistics viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302053
It should be quite simple.
2) pgmodeler - PostgreSQL Database Modeler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977116
It old and bigger. B
Hi Paulo,
take!
can take these for me:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193210
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266804
?
thanks in advance
regards
- gil
Il 23/11/2015 15:01, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade ha scritto:
Hi,
Two easy reviews. These are required to update
Hi,
Two easy reviews. These are required to update to sagemath-6.8.
[I will work to update to sagemath-6.9...]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278081
rw - Program that calculates rank-width and rank-decompositions
rw is a program that calculates rank-width and rank-decompositions.
I have these reviews for exchange:
1. gnome-shell-extension-panel-osd: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bu
g.cgi?id=1246904
a small extension, that makes the placement of shell-notifications on
the desktop configurable.
2. aeskulap: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269649
a DICOM-view
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
> If you're okay with mingw packages, I'd like to have these two reviewed:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265853
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265854
>
> Both are straight forward.
Sure, will do. Thanks, Sandr
On 13.11.2015 16:09, Jerry James wrote:
Here are the next 2 steps on the long slow march to the gap HAP
package for sagemath. Only a few left to go! Let me know what I can
review for you in exchange for these reviews.
gap-pkg-smallsemi: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281664
gap
Here are the next 2 steps on the long slow march to the gap HAP
package for sagemath. Only a few left to go! Let me know what I can
review for you in exchange for these reviews.
gap-pkg-smallsemi: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281664
gap-pkg-semigroups: https://bugzilla.redhat.com
On 10/22/2015 05:04 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> I need two packages reviews:
>
> 1. arb: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272606
>This is a FLINT add-on that newer versions of sagemath want.
I take it.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272652
--
Antonio Trande
mailto: s
I need two packages reviews:
1. arb: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272606
This is a FLINT add-on that newer versions of sagemath want.
2. gap-pkg-grape: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273244
I finally figured out how to adapt this package so that it uses the
fre
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 9:39 AM, gil wrote:
> hi
> take
> regards
> gil
Thank you! Let me know if you have packages I can review for you.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Co
hi
take
regards
gil
Il 28/08/2015 17:35, Jerry James ha scritto:
I need reviews for a couple of packages. Let me know what I can
review for you in exchange.
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252241
gap-pkg-genss, yet another step towards eventually providing
gap-pkg-hap [1] for
I need reviews for a couple of packages. Let me know what I can
review for you in exchange.
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252241
gap-pkg-genss, yet another step towards eventually providing
gap-pkg-hap [1] for sagemath to consume. This should be a really easy
review.
- https:
Inching closer to the goal of adding the GAP HAP package to Fedora for
sagemath to use, I need a couple more reviews. The first is an
external dependency needed by a forthcoming GAP package [1]. The
second is yet another of the noarch GAP packages that are made to be
simply unpacked in the main G
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:04 AM, gil wrote:
> hi
> taken
> can you review this
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215080
> thanks in advance
> gil
Taken, and thank you.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorap
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 9:32 AM, gil wrote:
> Il 27/05/2015 17:28, Jerry James ha scritto:
>>
>> I'm working toward supporting GAP's HAP package, which is used by
>> sagemath. I need reviews for some of the foundational packages (more
>> will be coming). There are some interdependencies, noted b
Il 27/05/2015 18:04, gil ha scritto:
Il 27/05/2015 17:28, Jerry James ha scritto:
I'm working toward supporting GAP's HAP package, which is used by
sagemath. I need reviews for some of the foundational packages (more
will be coming). There are some interdependencies, noted below:
1. gap-p
Il 27/05/2015 17:28, Jerry James ha scritto:
I'm working toward supporting GAP's HAP package, which is used by
sagemath. I need reviews for some of the foundational packages (more
will be coming). There are some interdependencies, noted below:
1. gap-pkg-autpgrp: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/
Il 27/05/2015 17:28, Jerry James ha scritto:
I'm working toward supporting GAP's HAP package, which is used by
sagemath. I need reviews for some of the foundational packages (more
will be coming). There are some interdependencies, noted below:
1. gap-pkg-autpgrp: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/
I'm working toward supporting GAP's HAP package, which is used by
sagemath. I need reviews for some of the foundational packages (more
will be coming). There are some interdependencies, noted below:
1. gap-pkg-autpgrp: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205777
No dependencies.
2. g
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Jerry James wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Jerry James wrote:
>> 1. gap-pkg-atlasrep: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185014
>> 2. gap-pkg-browse: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185015
>> 3. gap-pkg-io: https://bugzilla.redh
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Jerry James wrote:
> 1. gap-pkg-atlasrep: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185014
> 2. gap-pkg-browse: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185015
> 3. gap-pkg-io: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185016
> 4. gap-pkg-polymaking: htt
Hi!
>
> About two weeks ago I sent a list of review requests to this list asking
> for review swaps. All but one of them were picked up - many thanks to
> the reviewers. I can offer to trade the last remaining one on the list
> with you:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bu
tor 2015-01-22 klockan 10:48 -0700 skrev Jerry James:
> 5. gap-pkg-sonata: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185018
> Please let me know what I can review for you in exchange. Thank you.
Hi!
About two weeks ago I sent a list of review requests to this list asking
for review
When I iniatially submitted GAP and some of its packages as Fedora
packages, I followed what Debian was doing at the time. I think we
can do a few things a little better now. One way is to stop
translating the GAP package names into human readable form, and just
use the upstream names. Rather th
Il 12/01/2015 14:00, Mattias Ellert ha scritto:
Hi!
I have a couple of packages submitted for review and I offer to make
swaps for them:
Globus Toolkit packages (C code - mostly loadable modules)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144800
globus-gridmap-eppn-callout
https://bugzil
Hi!
I have a couple of packages submitted for review and I offer to make
swaps for them:
Globus Toolkit packages (C code - mostly loadable modules)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144800
globus-gridmap-eppn-callout
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144801
globus-xio-g
El 2014-12-23 15:41, Sandro Mani escribió:
Hi,
sqlitebrowser still looking for a reviewer :)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173375
Thanks!
Sandro
Taken.
--
Juan Orti
https://miceliux.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm
Hi,
sqlitebrowser still looking for a reviewer :)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173375
Thanks!
Sandro
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 03:04:36AM +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some packages needing review. All pretty simple cmake/qmake stuff:
>
> - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173373 - qtspell -
> Spell checking for Qt text widgets [*]
> - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 12/11/2014 08:04 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some packages needing review. All pretty simple cmake/qmake stuff:
>
> - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173373 - qtspell -
> Spell checking for Qt text widgets [*] -
> https://bugzi
Hi,
Some packages needing review. All pretty simple cmake/qmake stuff:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173373 - qtspell - Spell
checking for Qt text widgets [*]
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173378 - osgearth -
Dynamic map generation toolkit for OpenSceneGraph
-
Hi,
I've just submitted a couple of packages and their deps for review that
are useful for computational-neuroscience researchers - I need them for
my research work, for example:
python-pynn - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150105
python-neo - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cg
The upgraded OmegaT requires new (java) dependencies. They are not very
complex:
- gnudiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127879
- jsap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127894
- rundoc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1130755
- snip https://bugzilla
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Jerry James wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Jerry James wrote:
>> 2. python-persistent
>>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1102950.
>>Depends on #1. Ditto the comment for #1.
>
> Ditto. I need another review swap for this.
We're almo
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 8:46 PM, nonamedotc wrote:
> I have taken these two. I hope to do a first pass tomorrow.
Thank you! Let me know if there is something I can review for you
(now or later).
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https:/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/29/2014 12:19 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> Ditto. I need another review swap for this.
>
>> 4. python-random2
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104322
>
> This one is still up for grabs.
>
>> 5. python-zodbpickle
>> https://bugzi
On 07/29/2014 07:45 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Antonio Trande
> wrote:
>> We are "victims" of same man :D
>
> "Victim" is kind of a harsh word. I suspect something has happened in
> Real Life that is making him extra busy.
It's a way to saying (in Italy at least
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Antonio Trande wrote:
> We are "victims" of same man :D
"Victim" is kind of a harsh word. I suspect something has happened in
Real Life that is making him extra busy.
> Reviews swap between your RR and mine
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103420
On 07/29/2014 07:19 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Jerry James wrote:
>> The python-ZODB3 package, which I maintain, has been split into pieces. I
>> need several package reviews to get all the new pieces into place. I am
>> happy
>> to swap reviews for these, but the
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> The python-ZODB3 package, which I maintain, has been split into pieces. I
> need several package reviews to get all the new pieces into place. I am happy
> to swap reviews for these, but the number of reviews I need is sufficiently
> large tha
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Alexey I. Froloff wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 12:56:48PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
>> Swap ZODB, sphinx-rtd-theme and BTrees with
>> 1. osh - V6 Thompson Shell Port
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115121
>
> I'll take it.
Thank you. One t
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 12:56:48PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> Swap ZODB, sphinx-rtd-theme and BTrees with
> 1. osh - V6 Thompson Shell Port
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115121
I'll take it.
--
Regards,--
Sir Raorn. --- https://plus.google.com/+AlexeyFroloff
pgp3P6
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Jason Taylor wrote:
> Hi Christopher,
>
> I grabbed the zsh-lovers for a formal review.
Thank you.
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Noob here.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/
On Wed, 2014-07-02 at 12:56 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> Swap ZODB, sphinx-rtd-theme and BTrees with
>
> 1. osh - V6 Thompson Shell Port
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115121
>
> 2. zsh-lovers - A collection of tips, tricks and examples for the Z shell
>
> (This package is
Swap ZODB, sphinx-rtd-theme and BTrees with
1. osh - V6 Thompson Shell Port
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115121
2. zsh-lovers - A collection of tips, tricks and examples for the Z shell
(This package is pretty easy as it only contains a manpage)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show
The python-ZODB3 package, which I maintain, has been split into pieces. I
need several package reviews to get all the new pieces into place. I am happy
to swap reviews for these, but the number of reviews I need is sufficiently
large that it will take me a little time to get to all of the reviews
Hi Sandro,
On Wednesday, 25 June 2014 at 15:50, Sandro Mani wrote:
> On 25.06.2014 15:33, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> >Would anyone like to swap reviews?
> >
> >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112864
> >
> >elpa - High-performance library for parallel solution of eigenvalu
On 25.06.2014 15:33, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Would anyone like to swap reviews?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112864
elpa - High-performance library for parallel solution of eigenvalue
problems
This is an optional dependency of cp2k-2.5+ (and comes bundled in cp2k
Would anyone like to swap reviews?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112864
elpa - High-performance library for parallel solution of eigenvalue
problems
This is an optional dependency of cp2k-2.5+ (and comes bundled in cp2k-2.4).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082825
m
Would anyone like to swap reviews? I have 2 pending:
subunit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065539
This subsumes the existing python-subunit package. It would be good
if the reviewer could verify that the python-subunit subpackage is
essentially equivalent to the existing python-s
On 10.02.2014 04:19, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 07:07:01PM +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi,
Some more debian packaging stuff, useful when building certain
packages with pbuilder:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063044 - dh-autoreconf
- debhelper add-o
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 07:07:01PM +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some more debian packaging stuff, useful when building certain
> packages with pbuilder:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063044 - dh-autoreconf
> - debhelper add-on to call autoreconf and clean up after the bu
On 10.02.2014 00:58, Christopher Meng wrote:
I've marked your dput review as duplicate as I closed my dput review
bug months ago.
You can package dput-ng. Dput is nearly dead now.
Missed that. Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm
I've marked your dput review as duplicate as I closed my dput review bug
months ago.
You can package dput-ng. Dput is nearly dead now.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-o
On 09.02.2014 19:07, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi,
Some more debian packaging stuff, useful when building certain
packages with pbuilder:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063043 - cdbs - Common
build system for Debian packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063044 - dh-au
Hi,
Some more debian packaging stuff, useful when building certain packages
with pbuilder:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063043 - cdbs - Common
build system for Debian packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063044 - dh-autoreconf -
debhelper add-on to call autor
On 09.10.2013 18:56, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
Hi Sandro,
Sorry for the delay, but I've been very busy at work for the past
couple weeks. I've only read mails mentioning me, hence the very short
answer on the BZ. I also got sick last friday, before the very weekend
I wanted to work on fedora (yo
Hi Sandro,
Sorry for the delay, but I've been very busy at work for the past
couple weeks. I've only read mails mentioning me, hence the very short
answer on the BZ. I also got sick last friday, before the very weekend
I wanted to work on fedora (your review, but also my packages). It's
only today
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 3:32 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Dom, 2013-10-06 at 11:46 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>> >
>> > we still doesn't have rpmdevtools-8.4 packaged for F21 ...
>>
>> I'll look into it as soon as it starts to look that devscr
On 07.10.2013 02:32, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Dom, 2013-10-06 at 11:46 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
we still doesn't have rpmdevtools-8.4 packaged for F21 ...
I'll look into it as soon as it starts to look that devscripts will be approved.
hav
On Dom, 2013-10-06 at 11:46 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > we still doesn't have rpmdevtools-8.4 packaged for F21 ...
>
> I'll look into it as soon as it starts to look that devscripts will be
> approved.
haven't we enter in loop here ?
On 07.10.2013 02:26, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Seg, 2013-10-07 at 02:21 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 07.10.2013 02:17, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Dom, 2013-10-06 at 12:05 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
The *-keyring packages are not strictly
dependencies (though they would probably be appropriate "Sugges
On Seg, 2013-10-07 at 02:21 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> On 07.10.2013 02:17, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Dom, 2013-10-06 at 12:05 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> >> The *-keyring packages are not strictly
> >> dependencies (though they would probably be appropriate "Suggests:"
> >> if
> >> we had somet
On 07.10.2013 02:17, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Dom, 2013-10-06 at 12:05 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
The *-keyring packages are not strictly
dependencies (though they would probably be appropriate "Suggests:"
if
we had something similar), since pbuilder is not limited to building
packages for debian
On Dom, 2013-10-06 at 12:05 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> The *-keyring packages are not strictly
> dependencies (though they would probably be appropriate "Suggests:"
> if
> we had something similar), since pbuilder is not limited to building
> packages for debian and ubuntu, but might also be us
On 06.10.2013 06:27, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Seg, 2013-09-23 at 10:30 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 23.09.2013 02:01, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:14:29AM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 20.09.2013 06:37, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at
On 04.10.2013 20:49, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:30:11AM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 23.09.2013 02:01, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:14:29AM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 20.09.2013 06:37, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> we still doesn't have rpmdevtools-8.4 packaged for F21 ...
I'll look into it as soon as it starts to look that devscripts will be approved.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo
On Seg, 2013-09-23 at 10:30 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> On 23.09.2013 02:01, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:14:29AM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> >> On 20.09.2013 06:37, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 06:41:03PM +0200, Sandro Mani
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:30:11AM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
>
> On 23.09.2013 02:01, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:14:29AM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> >>On 20.09.2013 06:37, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >>>On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 06:41:03PM +0200, Sandro
On 23.09.2013 02:01, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:14:29AM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 20.09.2013 06:37, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 06:41:03PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi,
In the hope to continue the effort of getting pbuilder
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> This has the downside that it'll add the dependency on gnupg,
> which is not great. Maybe simply create a keyrings-filesystem
> package with this directory and have whoever installs keyrings
> depend on it.
If gnupg owns the di
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:14:29AM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
>
> On 20.09.2013 06:37, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 06:41:03PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>In the hope to continue the effort of getting pbuilder (and hence an
> >>easy way to build deb p
On 20.09.2013 06:37, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 06:41:03PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi,
In the hope to continue the effort of getting pbuilder (and hence an
easy way to build deb packages from fedora) into the repos (review
here: [1]), I've packaged devscripts,
301 - 400 of 533 matches
Mail list logo
