In trying to clean up the broken dependencies report, I intend to revive
three retired packages:
lwp:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745216
rpc2:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745218
rvm:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745219
In accordance with Fedora
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 01:24:02PM -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
In trying to clean up the broken dependencies report, I intend to revive
three retired packages:
lwp:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745216
rpc2:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745218
rvm:
On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 13:24 -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
In trying to clean up the broken dependencies report, I intend to revive
three retired packages:
lwp:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745216
I had a few spare minutes today, so I reviewed and approved this one.
On 10/11/2011 01:42 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
These are all needed for coda. Last I looked at them, getting them building
properly was not so hard, getting them to run properly was a significant
effort,
one that may not be worth it, unless there are way more coda users out there
than I'm aware
rvm:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745219
I'm reviewing this.
In accordance with Fedora policy
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Deprecated_Package),
I am posting here, and asking for help in re-reviewing these
On 10/11/2011 11:59 PM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
rvm:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745219
I'm reviewing this.
Done.
In accordance with Fedora policy
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Deprecated_Package),
I
