On 31/01/12 11:55, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> Ignorance must be fought through education, not bureaucracy!
>
> Kevin Kofler
Right. Bureaucracy must be minimized, but I also think, processes must
get designed in a way preventing people from making bad errors. If a
little bureaucracy facilita
Matthias Runge wrote:
> You're right, putting a testing line between rawhide and stable makes
> software in stable a little older. Nobody said, packages in testing
> should stay there as long as in debian-testing.
Any time wasted by going through the extra testing branch is too much time.
And the
On 31/01/12 01:44, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Matthias Runge wrote:
>> Maybe introducing a "testing"-release as concession to both sides is
>> acceptable?
>>
>> - newest versions, including risk of being broken -> rawhide
>> - (merely) stable versions will be propagated from rawhide to "testing"
>> - br
Matthias Runge wrote:
> Maybe introducing a "testing"-release as concession to both sides is
> acceptable?
>
> - newest versions, including risk of being broken -> rawhide
> - (merely) stable versions will be propagated from rawhide to "testing"
> - branching stable versions each six months (or so
On 30/01/12 00:59, Henrique Junior wrote:
> I've started talking to Greg KH, the guy who implemented openSUSE
> Tumbleweed. Here is what he said:
Oh great. Thank you for doing something constructive here.
I'm concerned about bundled libs and requirements of libraries. If I
remember right, up to
