On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
>> There still seems to be problems. I rebuilt it locally with an updated
>> F16 and now I get:
>> $ rpm -qp --requires
>> /home/andrea/rpmbuild/SRPMS/tecnoballz-0.92-13.fc16.src.rpm
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> There still seems to be problems. I rebuilt it locally with an updated
> F16 and now I get:
> $ rpm -qp --requires
> /home/andrea/rpmbuild/SRPMS/tecnoballz-0.92-13.fc16.src.rpm
> autoconf
> SDL_image-devel
> SDL_mixer-devel
> mikmod-deve
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Panu Matilainen
wrote:
> On 02/11/2012 02:52 PM, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>> a reporter just submitted this bug against tecnoballz:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789544
>>
>> After closer inspection, I see that the RPM doesn't requ
On 02/11/2012 07:06 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 02/11/2012 09:43 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
It's a bug in rpmbuild's file classification rules, should be fixed in
this update: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-1504
While this obviously isn't fault of tecnoballz, a rebuild is
On 02/11/2012 09:43 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
It's a bug in rpmbuild's file classification rules, should be fixed in
this update: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-1504
While this obviously isn't fault of tecnoballz, a rebuild is needed to
correct the dependencies.
- Panu -
On 02/11/2012 02:52 PM, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
Hi all,
a reporter just submitted this bug against tecnoballz:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789544
After closer inspection, I see that the RPM doesn't require the needed
libraries:
$ rpm -q --requires tecnoballz
/bin/sh
/bin/sh
Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> Hi all,
> a reporter just submitted this bug against tecnoballz:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789544
>
> After closer inspection, I see that the RPM doesn't require the needed
> libraries:
>
> $ rpm -q --requires tecnoballz
> /bin/sh
> /bin/sh
> conf
Hi all,
a reporter just submitted this bug against tecnoballz:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789544
After closer inspection, I see that the RPM doesn't require the needed
libraries:
$ rpm -q --requires tecnoballz
/bin/sh
/bin/sh
config(tecnoballz) = 0.92-11.fc16
hicolor-icon-the