Re: Ruby and Fedora 17

2012-06-19 Thread Matej Cepl
On 19/06/12 12:55, Frank Murphy wrote: Cool, always thought it was closed. Actually it always satisfied two of the three requirements for free format: it was always very well documented with open documents (without any patents required), and there was always at least one independent implemen

Re: Ruby and Fedora 17

2012-06-19 Thread Frank Murphy
On 19/06/12 11:50, Peter Lemenkov wrote: 2012/6/19 Frank Murphy: Would you be better to use an open format, not *.pdf? PDF looks quite open to me Cool, always thought it was closed. -- Regards, Frank "Jack of all, fubars" -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.

Re: Ruby and Fedora 17

2012-06-19 Thread Peter Lemenkov
2012/6/19 Frank Murphy : > Would you be better to use an open format, not *.pdf? PDF looks quite open to me -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Ruby and Fedora 17

2012-06-19 Thread Frank Murphy
On 19/06/12 11:44, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: Hi all, since Ruby/Fedora integration had some significant changes from F16 to F17, I thought it might be a good idea to write a summary of new features and send it out for all - see [1]. All comments and suggestions for further development are welcome

Ruby and Fedora 17

2012-06-19 Thread Bohuslav Kabrda
Hi all, since Ruby/Fedora integration had some significant changes from F16 to F17, I thought it might be a good idea to write a summary of new features and send it out for all - see [1]. All comments and suggestions for further development are welcome. -- Regards, Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda. [