Samba 4.12.0 on Fedora32: bind DNS say "named: client @...: update 'fedora.loc/IN' denied"

2020-03-08 Thread Dario Lesca
Hi, I have post this request on samba ml: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2020-March/228791.html someone here have some suggest to resolve this issue? I'm looking for the best way to register into DNS bind the windows clients joined to domain into DNS zone In a test environment, when the

Re: Samba 4.12.0 on Fedora32: bind DNS say "named: client @...: update 'fedora.loc/IN' denied"

2020-03-09 Thread Alexander Bokovoy
On su, 08 maalis 2020, Dario Lesca wrote: Hi, I have post this request on samba ml: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2020-March/228791.html someone here have some suggest to resolve this issue? I'm looking for the best way to register into DNS bind the windows clients joined to domain int

Re: Samba 4.12.0 on Fedora32: bind DNS say "named: client @...: update 'fedora.loc/IN' denied"

2020-03-09 Thread Dario Lesca
Thank for reply Alexander > I think it is a missing feature in samba_dl Is this feature missin only into samba+MIT or this lack is present also in samba +Heimdal? > Since Samba's samba_dlz does not provide any dynamic handling of the > ACL, you need to add it manually in named.conf for your zone

Re: Samba 4.12.0 on Fedora32: bind DNS say "named: client @...: update 'fedora.loc/IN' denied"

2020-03-09 Thread Alexander Bokovoy
On ma, 09 maalis 2020, Dario Lesca wrote: Thank for reply Alexander I think it is a missing feature in samba_dl Is this feature missin only into samba+MIT or this lack is present also in samba +Heimdal? It is independent of Kerberos implementation, so affects both types of deployment. You

Re: Samba 4.12.0 on Fedora32: bind DNS say "named: client @...: update 'fedora.loc/IN' denied"

2020-03-09 Thread Dario Lesca
Il giorno lun, 09/03/2020 alle 13.17 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy ha scritto: > It is independent of Kerberos implementation, so affects both types > of > deployment. Ok, it's a generic samba problem. It's right if I fill a bug on samba bugzilla? > You can add rules in the named.conf but they would b

Re: Samba 4.12.0 on Fedora32: bind DNS say "named: client @...: update 'fedora.loc/IN' denied"

2020-03-09 Thread Alexander Bokovoy
On ma, 09 maalis 2020, Dario Lesca wrote: Il giorno lun, 09/03/2020 alle 13.17 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy ha scritto: It is independent of Kerberos implementation, so affects both types of deployment. Ok, it's a generic samba problem. It's right if I fill a bug on samba bugzilla? Yes. I tried

Re: Samba 4.12.0 on Fedora32: bind DNS say "named: client @...: update 'fedora.loc/IN' denied"

2020-03-09 Thread Dario Lesca
Il giorno lun, 09/03/2020 alle 17.44 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy ha scritto: > As result, it looks like it is impossible to specify ACL to DLZ- > providedDNS zone other than through DLZ itself. Thank Alexander, I will fill a bug on samba bugzilla. Can I share the information you wrote here? (I thin y