Re: Seamonkey status

2011-08-24 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 08/24/2011 05:05 PM, Kai Engert wrote: > > I would appreciate contributions, reviews, specific proposals. > I did note some of the prominent ones in my first mail https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-August/155758.html https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL https:

Re: Seamonkey status

2011-08-24 Thread Kai Engert
On 24.08.2011 12:04, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 08/22/2011 03:01 AM, Kai Engert wrote: >> On 20.08.2011 13:59, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >>> On 08/20/2011 03:57 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote: Putting Firefox maintainers on CC to have a definite word on this, but I suspect that Seamonkey is generally c

Re: Seamonkey status

2011-08-24 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 08/22/2011 03:01 AM, Kai Engert wrote: > On 20.08.2011 13:59, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> On 08/20/2011 03:57 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote: >>> Putting Firefox maintainers on CC to have a definite word on this, but >>> I suspect that Seamonkey is generally completely in the arms of >>> community. I guess i

Re: Seamonkey status

2011-08-22 Thread Heiko Adams
Am 22.08.2011 22:48, schrieb Kai Engert: > On 21.08.2011 23:53, Heiko Adams wrote: >> Am 21.08.2011 23:35, schrieb Kai Engert: >>> On 20.08.2011 13:59, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 08/20/2011 03:57 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote: > Putting Firefox maintainers on CC to have a definite word on this, but >

Re: Seamonkey status

2011-08-22 Thread Kai Engert
On 21.08.2011 23:53, Heiko Adams wrote: > Am 21.08.2011 23:35, schrieb Kai Engert: >> On 20.08.2011 13:59, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >>> On 08/20/2011 03:57 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote: Putting Firefox maintainers on CC to have a definite word on this, but I suspect that Seamonkey is generally compl

Re: Seamonkey status

2011-08-21 Thread Heiko Adams
Am 21.08.2011 23:35, schrieb Kai Engert: > On 20.08.2011 13:59, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> On 08/20/2011 03:57 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote: >>> Putting Firefox maintainers on CC to have a definite word on this, but >>> I suspect that Seamonkey is generally completely in the arms of >>> community. I guess if

Re: Seamonkey status

2011-08-21 Thread Kai Engert
On 20.08.2011 13:59, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 08/20/2011 03:57 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote: >> Putting Firefox maintainers on CC to have a definite word on this, but >> I suspect that Seamonkey is generally completely in the arms of >> community. I guess if anybody wants to take it over formally in pkgd

Re: Seamonkey status

2011-08-20 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 08/20/2011 03:57 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote: > > Putting Firefox maintainers on CC to have a definite word on this, but > I suspect that Seamonkey is generally completely in the arms of > community. I guess if anybody wants to take it over formally in pkgdb > he would be welcome. > > Chris and Kai, am

Re: Seamonkey status

2011-08-20 Thread Matěj Cepl
Dne 20.8.2011 12:09, Rahul Sundaram napsal(a): Seamonkey hasn't been updated in a long time. Someone recently mentioned it in identi.ca and filed a bug report to update it. I was looking into it and the spec doesn't seem to be following the packaging guidelines. Source tarball seems to have

Seamonkey status

2011-08-20 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi Seamonkey hasn't been updated in a long time. Someone recently mentioned it in identi.ca and filed a bug report to update it. I was looking into it and the spec doesn't seem to be following the packaging guidelines. Source tarball seems to have created locally and doesn't point to a URL.