On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 01:35:05AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 01/27/2011 01:12 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 09:30:24AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Disappointingly the slashdot story paraphrased another site that went
with a sensationalized headline and was low on
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 15:25:40 +1300
Al Reay alre...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks like it's made the news
http://news.slashdot.org/story/11/01/25/1723259/Fedora-Infrastructure-Compromised
Disappointingly the slashdot story paraphrased another site that went
with a sensationalized headline and was
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 09:30:24AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 15:25:40 +1300
Al Reay alre...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks like it's made the news
http://news.slashdot.org/story/11/01/25/1723259/Fedora-Infrastructure-Compromised
Disappointingly the slashdot story
On 01/27/2011 01:12 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 09:30:24AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Disappointingly the slashdot story paraphrased another site that went
with a sensationalized headline and was low on facts. They didn't even
point to the actual announcement for folks
On 2011-01-25 10:50:48 PM, Till Maas wrote:
Did he really not have write access to the Fedora wiki or the different
trac instances (wiki, ticket system) on fedorahosted? I am not sure how
it is handled, but he also might have had push access to the comps repo
on fedorahosted.
Sorry, these are
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 17:10:20 -0500
Ricky Zhou ri...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Additionally it would be nice to investigate whether the account was
used to access the test machine resources for package maintainers:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Machine_Resources_For_Package_Maintainers
