On Sun, 8 Mar 2020, Gonçalo Camelo Neves Pereira wrote:
I have just submitted a build on copr and it has reported as failed, however
when I look to the logs it appeared to be successful. Can anyone helo me
understand what happened?
I have just submitted a build on copr and it has reported as failed,
however when I look to the logs it appeared to be successful. Can anyone
helo me understand what happened?
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/gpereira/freeehdl/build/1298338/
Best Regards,
Gonçalo Pereira
On 3/8/20
Ok, I will create a copr repository. Also, I already joined electronics-lab.
On 3/8/20 9:05 PM, Ian McInerney wrote:
On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 8:12 PM Gonçalo Camelo Neves Pereira
mailto:goncalo_pere...@outlook.pt>> wrote:
Hello Alain and Ian,
I definitely understand your struggle
On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 8:12 PM Gonçalo Camelo Neves Pereira <
goncalo_pere...@outlook.pt> wrote:
> Hello Alain and Ian,
>
> I definitely understand your struggle Alain, as an electrical engineer I
> also find myself dealing with this kind of problems, it is really
> frustrating. I have been using
Hello Gonçalo,
On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 9:13 PM Gonçalo Camelo Neves Pereira
wrote:
>
> One final question, I have managed to compile freehdl using a patch file from
> the maintainer of freehdl on Arch Linux repositories
>
Hello Alain and Ian,
I definitely understand your struggle Alain, as an electrical engineer I
also find myself dealing with this kind of problems, it is really
frustrating. I have been using a self compiled 0.0.20-rc2 version of
qucs without any problems but maybe for the fedora/epel
There is a list for the electronics lab, but it looks like it is inactive
currently:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/electronic-...@lists.fedoraproject.org/.
Perhaps we could revive it for coordinating this and other packages that
are electronics related.
-Ian
On Sun, Mar 8, 2020
Hi,
I am Alain, co-maintainer of Qucs, because I proposed to help Geoffrey with
Fedora Electonic Lab related software.
I saw Qucs was FTBFS, and planed to update to "latest" 0.0.19, or
0.0.20-rc2 ? But I did not dedicate enough time. Sigh.
I am not an experienced packager, nor developer. Just
Thank you for the update on the status of the qucs package.I will try to create a package and if that goes well I will get back to you.Best Regards,Gonçalo PereiraOn 8 Mar 2020 16:42, Ian McInerney wrote:Unfortunately, Qucs appears to be in a problematic state right now. There are two main issues
Unfortunately, Qucs appears to be in a problematic state right now. There
are two main issues with it:
1) It has a requires on freehdl, but freehdl was orphaned a year ago so it
is not in F30/31/32.
2) It fails to build in F32, the Bugzilla entry seems to suggest that this
is fixed if Qucs gets
Hello!
I am Gonçalo (gpereira). I am an electrical engineer so you can expect
my contributions to be around those kinds of packages. My motivation to
join was seeing the qucs package broken. I would like to dedicate some
time to understand the spec file in order to maintain it. I believe this
11 matches
Mail list logo
