Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com writes:
The Feature page still belongs to the FeaturePageIncomplete category.
I feel a somewhat similar way about boost and it would be nice if
there was some more detailed descriptions here.
Frankly, my biannual filing of Feature/Change page is mostly
Petr Machata pmach...@redhat.com writes:
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com writes:
The Feature page still belongs to the FeaturePageIncomplete category.
I feel a somewhat similar way about boost and it would be nice if
there was some more detailed descriptions here.
So if the consensus
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 16:59:40 +0200,
Petr Machata pmach...@redhat.com wrote:
So if the consensus is that Boost rebases don't need this sort of
paperwork, I'll simply not do it the next time around.
Boost changes should be noted. It touches a lot of packages and sometimes
changes need to
- Original Message -
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com writes:
The Feature page still belongs to the FeaturePageIncomplete category.
I feel a somewhat similar way about boost and it would be nice if
there was some more detailed descriptions here.
Frankly, my biannual
