Stanislav Ochotnicky (sochotni...@redhat.com) said:
> I believe most of them have already been taken (by me, Alexander
> Kurtakov or someone else). But a list of the remainining would be nice
> of course.
Sure, here you go (obviously, some of this is more eclipse-focused rather
than core java):
Excerpts from Bill Nottingham's message of Thu Sep 02 20:15:12 +0200 2010:
> Stanislav Ochotnicky (sochotni...@redhat.com) said:
> > Agenda TBD, but for now the idea is to:
> > * go through Tasks listed on [1]
>
> Can non-SIG members add tasks?
I don't see why not, as long as we are able to und
Stanislav Ochotnicky (sochotni...@redhat.com) said:
> Agenda TBD, but for now the idea is to:
> * go through Tasks listed on [1]
Can non-SIG members add tasks? If we have a Java SIG, I'd like there
to be some agreement on how to handle orphaned packages - right
now, we've got about 30 java packa
> On Mon, 30 Aug 2010, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
> > * AutoQA - QA guys are struggling with their effort to get their stuff
> > running from Fedora packages (shame on us if we can't make our own stuff
> > run from our packages)
> > * Name it :)
>
> At my work, first thing that happens with Java is
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
> * AutoQA - QA guys are struggling with their effort to get their stuff running
> from Fedora packages (shame on us if we can't make our own stuff run from our
> packages)
> * Name it :)
At my work, first thing that happens with Java is that Openj
Excerpts from Kevin Fenzi's message of Wed Sep 01 17:52:30 +0200 2010:
> On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 14:09:55 +0200
> Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
>
> > Excerpts from Stanislav Ochotnicky's message of Mon Aug 30 16:17:40
> > +0200 2010:
> > > I'll be starting
Excerpts from Orion Poplawski's message of Wed Sep 01 20:10:35 +0200 2010:
> On 09/01/2010 06:09 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> > Excerpts from Stanislav Ochotnicky's message of Mon Aug 30 16:17:40 +0200
> > 2010:
> >> I'll be starting Java SIG wik
On 09/01/2010 06:09 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> Excerpts from Stanislav Ochotnicky's message of Mon Aug 30 16:17:40 +0200
> 2010:
>> I'll be starting Java SIG wiki page soon, plus I guess we can peruse
>> java-devel mailing list for SIG discussions.
>
> I
On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 14:09:55 +0200
Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> Excerpts from Stanislav Ochotnicky's message of Mon Aug 30 16:17:40
> +0200 2010:
> > I'll be starting Java SIG wiki page soon, plus I guess we can peruse
> > java-devel mailing list for SIG discussi
Excerpts from Stanislav Ochotnicky's message of Mon Aug 30 16:17:40 +0200 2010:
> I'll be starting Java SIG wiki page soon, plus I guess we can peruse
> java-devel mailing list for SIG discussions.
In case you missed Alexander's mail the wiki is created [1]
I am plann
> I don't currently maintain any Java packages within Fedora but I did
> (somewhat) build the maven2 stack for EPEL[0] and I would be
> interested in seeing a Java SIG happen as well as would definitely
> join up.
>
Please everyone that is interested add yourself to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
I don't have any packages currently that anybody actually uses. I'd love to
join up and help a larger part of the community.
-Eric
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I don't currently maintain any Java packages within Fedora but I did
(somewhat) build the maven2 stack for EPEL[0] and I would be
interested in seeing a Java SIG happen as well as would definitely
join up.
-AdamM
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MavenEPEL
--
http://maxamillion.googlepages.com
mostly maven plugins,
> apache-commons, junit, velocity, checkstyle, plexus
> libraries). Involved in recent update of maven to v2.2.1.
>
> Reply if you're interested with helping out and being able to
> see/influence where Java packaging in Fedora is going. I know there will
> On 08/30/2010 07:33 AM, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
> > I'm pretty sure there are a number of other reasons for such SIG.
>
> Our relationship with jpackage really needs to improve. They do a lot
> of packaging work, we've "borrowed" a lot of that work, and then
> diverged without contributing ba
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/30/2010 07:33 AM, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
> I'm pretty sure there are a number of other reasons for such SIG.
Our relationship with jpackage really needs to improve. They do a lot
of packaging work, we've "borrowed" a lot of that work, and th
> On 30/08/10 15:38, Aditya Patawari wrote:
>
>
> > It would be nice if we can help out newbies as well as other maintainers
> > like me to package and maybe develop java apps.
>
> Similar, am only learning Java (1st Semester in College finished)
> But would like to learn to package Java apps l
> On 30/08/10 15:38, Aditya Patawari wrote:
>
>
> > It would be nice if we can help out newbies as well as other maintainers
> > like me to package and maybe develop java apps.
>
> Similar, am only learning Java (1st Semester in College finished)
> But would like to learn to package Java apps l
On 30/08/10 15:38, Aditya Patawari wrote:
> It would be nice if we can help out newbies as well as other maintainers
> like me
> to package and maybe develop java apps.
>
Similar, am only learning Java (1st Semester in College finished)
But would like to learn to package Java apps like Azureus
ted with helping out and being able to
> see/influence where Java packaging in Fedora is going. I know there will
> be at least a few people joining in.
>
> I'll be starting Java SIG wiki page soon, plus I guess we can peruse
> java-devel mailing list for
(needs work)
* Tomcat - phase out tomcat5 , package tomcat 7
* AutoQA - QA guys are struggling with their effort to get their stuff running
from Fedora packages (shame on us if we can't make our own stuff run from our
packages)
* Name it :)
I'm pretty sure there are a number of o
erested with helping out and being able to
see/influence where Java packaging in Fedora is going. I know there will
be at least a few people joining in.
I'll be starting Java SIG wiki page soon, plus I guess we can peruse
java-devel mailing list for SIG discussions.
--
Stanislav Ochotni
22 matches
Mail list logo