On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 11:09 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> > Dependency Checks
> > -
> >
> > Also, I've tried to run some repoqueries to determine which of our packages
> > are
> > leaf packages that could be retired eventually. However, running
> > repoqueries on
> > f29 against th
Dependency Checks
-
Also, I've tried to run some repoqueries to determine which of our packages are
leaf packages that could be retired eventually. However, running repoqueries on
f29 against the rawhide repos crashed dnf for some reason ... so I can't
automate that easily, yet.
On 01. 04. 19 10:55, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 30. 03. 19 v 10:53 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
On 29. 03. 19 22:25, Fabio Valentini wrote:
Dependency Checks
-
Also, I've tried to run some repoqueries to determine which of our
packages are
leaf packages that could be retired eventuall
On Mon, Apr 1, 2019, 10:55 Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 30. 03. 19 v 10:53 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> > On 29. 03. 19 22:25, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> >> Dependency Checks
> >> -
> >>
> >> Also, I've tried to run some repoqueries to determine which of our
> >> packages are
> >> le
Dne 30. 03. 19 v 10:53 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> On 29. 03. 19 22:25, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
>> Dependency Checks
>> -
>>
>> Also, I've tried to run some repoqueries to determine which of our
>> packages are
>> leaf packages that could be retired eventually. However, running
>> r
On 29. 03. 19 22:25, Fabio Valentini wrote:
Hi everybody,
It looks like the first round of orphans has been taken in by our SIG - this
seemed to be a good time to do inventory and think about how to proceed.
Still missing:
stewardship-sig: apache-logging-parent, woodstox-core, apache-commons-
Hi everybody,
It looks like the first round of orphans has been taken in by our SIG - this
seemed to be a good time to do inventory and think about how to proceed.
Status Report
-
First of all, I've written a small script [0] that produces a simple HTML page
of the current status of
