On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 05:50:35 -0500 (EST), Kamil Paral wrote:
> > Taskotron doesn't notice if subpackages have been dropped and cause
> > unresolvable dependencies because they are not obsoleted anywhere.
>
> Yes, depcheck doesn't currently handle that. I've created:
> https://phab.qadevel.cloud.f
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 11:48:55 -0700, Tim Flink wrote:
> > Taskotron doesn't notice if subpackages have been dropped and cause
> > unresolvable dependencies because they are not obsoleted anywhere.
>
> This isn't so much something that taskotron's checks missed as it's
> something we're not even ch
On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 11:00:00 +0100
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Taskotron doesn't notice if subpackages have been dropped and cause
> unresolvable dependencies because they are not obsoleted anywhere.
This isn't so much something that taskotron's checks missed as it's
something we're not even check
> Taskotron doesn't notice if subpackages have been dropped and cause
> unresolvable dependencies because they are not obsoleted anywhere.
Yes, depcheck doesn't currently handle that. I've created:
https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T384
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.o
Taskotron doesn't notice if subpackages have been dropped and cause
unresolvable dependencies because they are not obsoleted anywhere.
Examples: jogl2-javadoc, miglayout-examples, glusterfs-regression-tests
rubygem-json-doc, rubygem-rake-doc, and more
Yum is broken in the same way. And by desi
