The default fs.inotify.max_user_watches limit is too low.

2020-11-18 Thread Gargoyle
I've just made the switch from Ubuntu to Fedora 33 for my main desktop system. Of the few teething problems I am going through, the initial 8192 limit for fs.inotify.max_user_watches was probably causing the most side effects. As a developer, I pretty much have netbeans open all day and am fore

Re: The default fs.inotify.max_user_watches limit is too low.

2020-11-18 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 09:13:54 +, Gargoyle wrote: > I've just made the switch from Ubuntu to Fedora 33 for my main desktop > system. Of the few teething problems I am going through, the initial 8192 > limit for fs.inotify.max_user_watches was probably causing the most side > effects. As a develo

Re: The default fs.inotify.max_user_watches limit is too low.

2020-11-18 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 11/18/20 10:13 AM, Gargoyle wrote: I've just made the switch from Ubuntu to Fedora 33 for my main desktop system. Of the few teething problems I am going through, the initial 8192 limit for fs.inotify.max_user_watches was probably causing the most side effects. As a developer, I pretty much

Re: The default fs.inotify.max_user_watches limit is too low.

2020-11-18 Thread Tom Hughes via devel
On 18/11/2020 09:58, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 11/18/20 10:13 AM, Gargoyle wrote: If not, then perhaps the default should be significantly increased with the aim of removing the problem for new users with modern desktop/laptop machines which probably have 4GB+ RAM. I've not rebooted my machine

Re: The default fs.inotify.max_user_watches limit is too low.

2020-11-18 Thread Marius Schwarz
Am 18.11.20 um 10:13 schrieb Gargoyle:    4903 4620  /data/Applications/java/jdk-15/bin/java -Djdk.home=/data/Applications/java/jdk-15 -classpath /data/Applications/netbeans The first action that comes in mind is to reduce the amount of notifiers

Re: The default fs.inotify.max_user_watches limit is too low.

2020-11-18 Thread Ondrej Budai
st 18. 11. 2020 v 10:16 odesílatel Gargoyle napsal: > I've just made the switch from Ubuntu to Fedora 33 for my main desktop > system. Of the few teething problems I am going through, the initial > 8192 limit for fs.inotify.max_user_watches was probably causing the most > side effects. As a devel

Re: The default fs.inotify.max_user_watches limit is too low.

2020-11-18 Thread Luca BRUNO
On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 09:13:54 + Gargoyle wrote: > I've just made the switch from Ubuntu to Fedora 33 for my main > desktop system. Of the few teething problems I am going through, the > initial 8192 limit for fs.inotify.max_user_watches was probably > causing the most side effects. > > If not,

Re: The default fs.inotify.max_user_watches limit is too low.

2020-11-18 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 10:49 AM Ankur Sinha wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 09:13:54 +, Gargoyle wrote: > > I've just made the switch from Ubuntu to Fedora 33 for my main desktop > > system. Of the few teething problems I am going through, the initial 8192 > > limit for fs.inotify.max_user_wa

Re: The default fs.inotify.max_user_watches limit is too low.

2020-11-18 Thread Gargoyle
On 18/11/2020 13:28, Luca BRUNO wrote: A dynamic default is being tackled directly at kernel level. There is a currently in-progress patch on linux-fsdevel for this, first revision is at https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-fsdevel/patch/20201026204418.23197-1-long...@redhat.com/. For furth