Re: Thrashing between updates-testing and updates

2010-03-02 Thread Kevin Kofler
Jesse Keating wrote: That's going to be pretty difficult to do with the way our push and sync scripts work. At most an update that is going from testing to stable should disappear for only a few hours, that would be between the updates-testing push of the day an the subsequent branched

Re: Thrashing between updates-testing and updates

2010-03-02 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 12:26:35 +0100, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: We could have the branched compose compose from dist-f13 + dist-f13-updates and move everything which was part of its compose from dist-f13-updates to dist-f13 on completion. That way dist-f13-updates would

Re: Thrashing between updates-testing and updates

2010-03-02 Thread Jesse Keating
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 06:59 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: probably could save some churn if the packages were signed with the same key. (I am not sure if that is true yet; though my understanding is that there will eventually be one key used to sign any official builds coming out of koji.)

Thrashing between updates-testing and updates

2010-03-01 Thread Bruno Wolff III
Currently I am following F13 and I have been noticing a lot of packages disappearing from updates-testing before showing up in the branched release (but similar things happen with normal updates, just less often). When things disappear from updates-testing it isn't immediately obvious if this is

Re: Thrashing between updates-testing and updates

2010-03-01 Thread Jesse Keating
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 12:42 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: Currently I am following F13 and I have been noticing a lot of packages disappearing from updates-testing before showing up in the branched release (but similar things happen with normal updates, just less often). When things