Re: To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

2015-10-23 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 23.10.2015 um 04:37 schrieb Kevin Kofler: Reindl Harald wrote: it *is* useful in case nobody reports a problem because you get the confirmation the package not only works for you Sorry, "it is not useful" was too strong a statement. I mean it is not *as relevant* for the decision whether

Re: To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

2015-10-22 Thread Kevin Kofler
Sérgio Basto wrote: > Kevin, Sounds like the experiences with an update with 50 packages like > a KDE , but most cases are just a leaf package, which a "works for me" > is a good feedback, for me . Even for a leaf package, it does not work. The example of 10 "works for me" and 1 "deletes all my

Re: To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

2015-10-21 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:18:09AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 21.10.2015 um 02:22 schrieb Kevin Kofler: > >Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > >>The testers write "works for me" or report a new bug. When things work, > >>there's nothing to evaluate. Doing the counting by hand is just

Re: To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

2015-10-21 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Qua, 2015-10-21 at 02:22 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > The testers write "works for me" or report a new bug. When things work, > > there's nothing to evaluate. Doing the counting by hand is just a way to > > waste time. > > 10 "works for me" and 1 "deletes

Re: To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

2015-10-21 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 21.10.2015 um 02:22 schrieb Kevin Kofler: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: The testers write "works for me" or report a new bug. When things work, there's nothing to evaluate. Doing the counting by hand is just a way to waste time. 10 "works for me" and 1 "deletes all my data" do not

Re: To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

2015-10-20 Thread Kevin Kofler
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > The testers write "works for me" or report a new bug. When things work, > there's nothing to evaluate. Doing the counting by hand is just a way to > waste time. 10 "works for me" and 1 "deletes all my data" do not make a quality of +9. They mean a package

Re: To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

2015-10-19 Thread Jan Kratochvil
On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 22:03:43 +0200, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 21:14:25 +0200 Jan Kratochvil > wrote: > > > That is a Bug of Bodhi, the URLs should be more descriptive. > > (I have not filed it.) > > I thought it was filed, but I can't seem to find it

Re: To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

2015-10-19 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 15:33:38 +0200 Jan Kratochvil wrote: > There were filed and "fixed" exactly the opposite Bugs, to switch > from NVRA to the FEDORA-2015-7113eaf84e style: > RFE: use update alias/updateid instead of update title in > methods

Re: To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

2015-10-19 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 02:45:14AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Well, we don't know for sure that those updates lost autokarma > > (Although it seems likely). It might be the maintainers pushed them > > with autokarma disabled. > > And they should have, in any case, because

Re: To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

2015-10-19 Thread Kevin Kofler
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Seriously? When I push out an update to testing, I already have done the > tests on it in my system, and it *think* it is correct. What would be > the point of pushing out something that is known to be broken? > > The time in testing is for others to others to

Re: To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

2015-10-18 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 21:14:25 +0200 Jan Kratochvil wrote: > That is a Bug of Bodhi, the URLs should be more descriptive. > (I have not filed it.) I thought it was filed, but I can't seem to find it now. ;( If you could file one that would be great, or I can if you

Re: To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

2015-10-18 Thread Kevin Kofler
Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Well, we don't know for sure that those updates lost autokarma > (Although it seems likely). It might be the maintainers pushed them > with autokarma disabled. And they should have, in any case, because autokarma is just broken by design. Who is more qualified to decide when

Re: To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

2015-10-18 Thread Richard Fearn
> Nb. did bodhi2 stopped sending „your update reached 7 days in testing > and can be pushed to stable” emails? https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/298 Regards, Richard -- Richard Fearn richardfe...@gmail.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

2015-10-18 Thread Jan Kratochvil
On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 14:56:11 +0200, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 10/15/2015 06:49 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-11787 > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4638 [...] > >

Re: To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

2015-10-18 Thread Tomasz Torcz
Nb. did bodhi2 stopped sending „your update reached 7 days in testing and can be pushed to stable” emails? -- Tomasz Torcz ,,If you try to upissue this patchset I shall be seeking xmpp: zdzich...@chrome.pl an IP-routable hand grenade.'' -- Andrew Morton (LKML) -- devel

Re: To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

2015-10-17 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 18:48:48 +0100 Sérgio Basto wrote: > yes , it is just autokarma thats messed up and push packages is one > way to fix the problem ..., which is easier . Well, we don't know for sure that those updates lost autokarma (Although it seems likely). It might be

Re: To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

2015-10-16 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sex, 2015-10-16 at 09:00 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 23:49:22 +0100 > Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > Hi, > > We detect migration problem from bodhi 1 to 2 [1] > > > > Can someone workaround and push to stable, because they reached the > > stable karma

Re: To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

2015-10-16 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/15/2015 06:49 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, We detect migration problem from bodhi 1 to 2 [1] > > Can someone workaround and push to stable, because they reached > the stable karma threshold: > >

Re: To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

2015-10-16 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 23:49:22 +0100 Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, > We detect migration problem from bodhi 1 to 2 [1] > > Can someone workaround and push to stable, because they reached the > stable karma threshold: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-11787 >

Re: To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

2015-10-16 Thread Ralph Bean
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 09:00:29AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I'd suggest all maintainers should periodically check: > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?user==testing > For their updates that are in testing. Noting here that there's an easy link to that url from your Bodhi profile page

To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

2015-10-15 Thread Sérgio Basto
Hi, We detect migration problem from bodhi 1 to 2 [1] Can someone workaround and push to stable, because they reached the stable karma threshold: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-11787 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4638 This doesn't reached the stable