Lukas Javorsky writes:
> I want to apologize one more time.
> This experience will be written in my mind forever.
Try not to punish yourself. A good friend once completely broke
XEmacs by bumping the version number in version.el from "20.0-betaXX"
to "20.0". (It turned out that somebody had
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 12:19:48PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 01:10:48PM +0200, Lukas Javorsky wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm the one to blame, I'm really sorry about that, it was a new experience
> > for
> > me and I didn't know it has its own workflow.
> >
> >
The build has been untagged.
I want to apologize one more time.
This experience will be written in my mind forever.
Thank you to everyone who helped with this
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 1:30 PM Richard W.M. Jones
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 01:23:02PM +0200, Lukas Javorsky wrote:
> > > I
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 01:23:02PM +0200, Lukas Javorsky wrote:
> > I believe we need a Fedora administrator of some kind to
> > untag it.
> Do you know where I could find some?
I'm hoping on this mailing list :-)
Rich.
> > The bigger problem is how can we build util-linux against the new
> >
> I believe we need a Fedora administrator of some kind to
> untag it.
Do you know where I could find some?
> The bigger problem is how can we build util-linux against the new
> library. I guess pcre2 will have to supply a compat subpackage ...
Yes, we will discuss this for sure, we'll just
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 01:10:48PM +0200, Lukas Javorsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm the one to blame, I'm really sorry about that, it was a new experience for
> me and I didn't know it has its own workflow.
>
> Could you please help me with "How to untag it" properly and that this change
> doesn't
Hello,
I'm the one to blame, I'm really sorry about that, it was a new experience
for me and I didn't know it has its own workflow.
Could you please help me with "How to untag it" properly and that this
change doesn't break anything else?
Thank you so much and apologies for the inconvenience
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 12:00:37PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=26566365
>
> Seems to have gone from:
> /usr/lib64/libpcre2-posix.so.2
> to:
> /usr/lib64/libpcre2-posix.so.3
>
> This broke a few things, notably util-linux. My attempt to
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=26566365
Seems to have gone from:
/usr/lib64/libpcre2-posix.so.2
to:
/usr/lib64/libpcre2-posix.so.3
This broke a few things, notably util-linux. My attempt to rebuild
util-linux failed, so I'm still looking at that.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones,
