Jilayne Lovejoy wrote:
> It is not scalable
> for Richard to submit most of the licenses to SPDX and me to create the
> files for those licenses... :)
On the other hand, having many people learn a complex process and use it
only once is very inefficient use of man-hours.
> We have been implemen
On 2/20/23 17:51, Richard Fontana wrote:
If anyone has
suggestions for what form such documentation could take that would be
helpful. :)
Presentation: a .ods spreadsheet with one row per identifiable hunk of software,
with columns: name, version, release, architecture(s), minimum date, maximum
On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 7:17 PM Jilayne Lovejoy wrote:
> Let us know if you have any questions or suggestions for improvements. We've
> had two "office hours" so far with no attendees, but happy to schedule a few
> more for open discussion or questions!
We've also talked about developing more
Thanks to all the package maintainers who have been diligently updating
their packages to SPDX identifiers! Here are a few interesting stats:
- 160 issues in the Fedora-license-data, which has resulted in 34 new
license/TOML files being added to the data, and 18 more ready to be
added
https:/
