On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 7:24 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 03/12/15 13:57 -0700, Dave Johansen wrote:
>
>> My hope was to maintain source compatibility and not binary compatibility.
>> For example, the header file moved from:
>> /usr/include/format.h
>> to:
>> /usr/include/cppformat/cppformat.h
On 03/12/15 13:57 -0700, Dave Johansen wrote:
My hope was to maintain source compatibility and not binary compatibility.
For example, the header file moved from:
/usr/include/format.h
to:
/usr/include/cppformat/cppformat.h
I was planning on updating the stable release with a symlink at:
/usr/inc
On 12/03/2015 09:57 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
> My hope was to maintain source compatibility and not binary
> compatibility. For example, the header file moved from:
> /usr/include/format.h
> to:
> /usr/include/cppformat/cppformat.h
>
> I was planning on updating the stable release with a symlink a
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 12/03/2015 07:13 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
> > cppformat 2.0.0 was released [1] and it has several breaking changes. In
> > addition to API/ABI changes, the soname changed and the header file was
> > relocated. Since this package was recent
On 12/03/2015 07:13 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
> cppformat 2.0.0 was released [1] and it has several breaking changes. In
> addition to API/ABI changes, the soname changed and the header file was
> relocated. Since this package was recently added to Fedora, I don't know
> if any packages depend on it
cppformat 2.0.0 was released [1] and it has several breaking changes. In
addition to API/ABI changes, the soname changed and the header file was
relocated. Since this package was recently added to Fedora, I don't know if
any packages depend on it, so my question is "Is this a "self contained" or
"s
