On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 11:17 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Kamil Paral kpa...@redhat.com
wrote:
Something like this? [1] [2]
Yup! Something a lot like that! I did look over the AutoQA wiki
before
posting but didn't know enough about rpmguard to know
Just an idea I had and wanted to float it out to the group...
I think it would be nice to get an informational (obviously, not a
blocking type check) to get changes in the requires or provides of a
package. It would be a hassle to check it manually but I hope it would
be fairly easy to automate.
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
Just an idea I had and wanted to float it out to the group...
I think it would be nice to get an informational (obviously, not a
blocking type check) to get changes in the requires or provides of a
package. It would be
Just an idea I had and wanted to float it out to the group...
I think it would be nice to get an informational (obviously, not a
blocking type check) to get changes in the requires or provides of a
package. It would be a hassle to check it manually but I hope it
would
be fairly easy to
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Kamil Paral kpa...@redhat.com wrote:
Something like this? [1] [2]
Yup! Something a lot like that! I did look over the AutoQA wiki before
posting but didn't know enough about rpmguard to know that where I
needed to look :)
We already do that in the form of
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 11:17 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Kamil Paral kpa...@redhat.com wrote:
Something like this? [1] [2]
Yup! Something a lot like that! I did look over the AutoQA wiki before
posting but didn't know enough about rpmguard to know that where I
