On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 06:59:57PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 03:46:31PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
On 09/21/2011 01:03 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
So, there's a meta-point here: we currently 'require' Beta releases to
boot as guests on Xen
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 03:08:41PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:47:57PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 06:59:57PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 03:46:31PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
On
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 04:03:49PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
So, there's a meta-point here: we currently 'require' Beta releases to
boot as guests on Xen hosts:
The release must boot successfully as a virtual guest in a situation
where the virtual host is running a
Hi,
What Xen implementation is considered supported for FC16 DomU? I'm asking
because on Xen implementation we were testing yesterday FC16 DomU
installation failed compared to FC15 DomU success on the very same Dom0. Are
failures like we've encountered candidates for bugreports?
Is there a place
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:14:23PM +0300, Myroslav Opyr wrote:
Hi,
What Xen implementation is considered supported for FC16 DomU?
Any commonly available upstream Xen releases.
Fedora itself
(ie. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/XenPvopsDom0).
Also Xen in RHEL 5, although that's more
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:08:40PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:14:23PM +0300, Myroslav Opyr wrote:
Hi,
What Xen implementation is considered supported for FC16 DomU?
Any commonly available upstream Xen releases.
Fedora itself
(ie.
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 12:14 +0300, Myroslav Opyr wrote:
Hi,
What Xen implementation is considered supported for FC16 DomU? I'm
asking because on Xen implementation we were testing yesterday FC16
DomU installation failed compared to FC15 DomU success on the very
same Dom0. Are failures
There are known bugs in FC15/FC16 that have been filled some time ago that
folks will sadly run into: 728775, 658387 and 668063
Fortunatly the bugs have patches attached and the files to be modified are
shell scripts.
Yep, links here:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 05:45:39PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
([3]https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/219). It takes time
for us
to setup test environment, and would be good to have some info in
advance.
Ok, so some basic steps to test Xen dom0 functionality
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 10:10 -0500, W. Michael Petullo wrote:
There are known bugs in FC15/FC16 that have been filled some time ago that
folks will sadly run into: 728775, 658387 and 668063
Fortunatly the bugs have patches attached and the files to be modified are
shell scripts.
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 01:33:54AM +0300, Myroslav Opyr wrote:
Hi,
Hello,
Virtualization Test day is expected to be on September 15th this year
([1]https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/232).
So that's tomorrow!
Luckily Xen Hackathon (@Munich) event is just happening,
so
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:25:23AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 02:25:52PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 01:33:54AM +0300, Myroslav Opyr wrote:
Hi,
Hello,
Virtualization Test day is expected to be on September 15th this
Hi,
Virtualization Test day is expected to be on September 15th this year (
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/232).
We are willing to help test
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/XenPvopsDom0 but find too little
information about test methods (
13 matches
Mail list logo
