Re: Voice recognition packages need a new maintainer

2017-03-15 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 4:59 AM, Jerry James wrote: > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 5:27 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> You can assign pocketsphinx and it's dep sphinxbase to me as I need >> them for a project I'm investigating ATM. > > Packagedb is claiming that you are not in the packager group, from

Re: Voice recognition packages need a new maintainer

2017-03-14 Thread Jerry James
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 5:27 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > You can assign pocketsphinx and it's dep sphinxbase to me as I need > them for a project I'm investigating ATM. Packagedb is claiming that you are not in the packager group, from which I conclude that one of the following is true: - the FAS

Re: Voice recognition packages need a new maintainer

2017-03-14 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 2:35 AM, Jerry James wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I am the primary point of contact for a handful of voice > recognition-related packages: > - cmusphinx3 > - irstlm > - openfst > - opengrm-ngram > - pocketsphinx > - sphinxbase > - sphinxtrain > > I have not used these pack

Voice recognition packages need a new maintainer

2017-03-13 Thread Jerry James
Hello everybody, I am the primary point of contact for a handful of voice recognition-related packages: - cmusphinx3 - irstlm - openfst - opengrm-ngram - pocketsphinx - sphinxbase - sphinxtrain I have not used these packages myself for quite some time, and am unlikely to start using them again an