Neal Gompa wrote:
> Not only is that terrible advice, it's actually *wrong*. If you're
> going to do bad things like that, at least make sure to test it.
I did:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/blogilo/c/ee482f1b33b50d79190951180d209e749b545dcd?branch=master
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 5:45 AM Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> FYI, the easiest and most portable fix is to add:
> -B.
> (followed by a space or some other whitespace) before the . or .. (source
> directory) argument. (That basically undoes the effects of this pointless
> incompatible macro change.)
>
FYI, the easiest and most portable fix is to add:
-B.
(followed by a space or some other whitespace) before the . or .. (source
directory) argument. (That basically undoes the effects of this pointless
incompatible macro change.)
Kevin Kofler
On Wed, 2020-08-05 at 07:59 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 7:53 AM Lukáš Hrázký wrote:
> > Hi Neal, all,
> >
> > On Tue, 2020-08-04 at 07:42 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > ...
> >
> > What if I build for multiple platforms at the same time? E.g. in dnf we
> > have:
> >
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Thu, 2020-08-06 at 07:48 +, Martin Gansser wrote:
> what do I have to do if I want to keep the timestamp?
>
> %install
> %make_install INSTALL="install -p"
>
>
> %cmake_install INSTALL="install -p" did not work.
Just use %cmake_install.
what do I have to do if I want to keep the timestamp?
%install
%make_install INSTALL="install -p"
%cmake_install INSTALL="install -p" did not work.
Regards
Martin
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 7:53 AM Lukáš Hrázký wrote:
>
> Hi Neal, all,
>
> On Tue, 2020-08-04 at 07:42 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 7:32 AM Till Hofmann
> > wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I have a number of packages that are FTBFS due to
> > >
Hi Neal, all,
On Tue, 2020-08-04 at 07:42 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 7:32 AM Till Hofmann
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have a number of packages that are FTBFS due to
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CMake_to_do_out-of-source_builds.
> >
> > None of my
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 1:40 PM José Abílio Matos wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 4 August 2020 12.42.30 WEST Neal Gompa wrote:
> > Then you should do the following:
> >
> > %undefine __cmake_in_source_build
> >
> > %cmake
> > %cmake_build
> > %cmake_install
>
> Would not it be more clean to place the
On Tuesday, 4 August 2020 12.42.30 WEST Neal Gompa wrote:
> Then you should do the following:
>
> %undefine __cmake_in_source_build
>
> %cmake
> %cmake_build
> %cmake_install
Would not it be more clean to place the %undefine line inside guards?
%if (0%{?rhel} || (0%{?fedora} && 0%{?fedora} <
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 9:55 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 04. 08. 20 14:54, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > What's the proper way to deal with a "make test" in %check, I've seen
> > a few get confused still by that even when the %cmake bits earlier in
> > the process pass, it seems there's not a
On 04. 08. 20 14:54, Peter Robinson wrote:
What's the proper way to deal with a "make test" in %check, I've seen
a few get confused still by that even when the %cmake bits earlier in
the process pass, it seems there's not a %cmake_test equiv.
I've used:
%cmake_build -- test
There is
> > I have a number of packages that are FTBFS due to
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CMake_to_do_out-of-source_builds.
> >
> > None of my packages has seen any commits for that change. I've read on
> > the list that packages that are considered "a complete mess" are not
> > touched.
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 7:32 AM Till Hofmann wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have a number of packages that are FTBFS due to
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CMake_to_do_out-of-source_builds.
>
> None of my packages has seen any commits for that change. I've read on
> the list that packages that
Hi all,
I have a number of packages that are FTBFS due to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CMake_to_do_out-of-source_builds.
None of my packages has seen any commits for that change. I've read on
the list that packages that are considered "a complete mess" are not
touched. Are all my
15 matches
Mail list logo