On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 20:10:08 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > Are packages really supposed to put files in "/local/"?
>
> no - /usr/local/ is admin area - period
True - ignoring the 'period' ;)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/d
> -Original Message-
> From: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:devel-
> boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Reindl Harald
> Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 14:10
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: Where should a package
Am 23.12.2014 um 20:03 schrieb Samuel Sieb:
On 12/23/2014 10:24 AM, John Florian wrote:
Following the example set by other packages, I’ve traditionally used
/usr/local/share/ruby/site_ruby/facter/MY_PACKAGE, but what if you have
a fact that isn’t written in Ruby? I’m also aware of
/etc/facter
On 12/23/2014 10:24 AM, John Florian wrote:
Following the example set by other packages, I’ve traditionally used
/usr/local/share/ruby/site_ruby/facter/MY_PACKAGE, but what if you have
a fact that isn’t written in Ruby? I’m also aware of
/etc/facter/facts.d but I suspect that’s considered inappr
Following the example set by other packages, I've traditionally used
/usr/local/share/ruby/site_ruby/facter/MY_PACKAGE, but what if you have a fact
that isn't written in Ruby? I'm also aware of /etc/facter/facts.d but I
suspect that's considered inappropriate for a package to use and should be
