On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 08:40:25AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > We have delta RPMs for going from GA release packages to current
>> > updates and from last update to current update. Doing deltas from all
>> > previous updates to all fut
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 11:44:16AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 08:40:25AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > There is a bit of a problem with that, though, and packages that
> > iterate quickly. 52.0-6 went stable on 2017-03-24. 52.0-7 went stable
> > on 2017-03-30. 52.0.
On 04/07/2017 05:57 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 17:54 +0200, Christian Dersch wrote:
On 04/07/2017 05:40 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 10:32 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 02:29:02PM -, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
I had firefo
On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 17:54 +0200, Christian Dersch wrote:
>
> On 04/07/2017 05:40 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 10:32 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 02:29:02PM -, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
> > > > I had firefox-52.0-6.fc25 and there was no
On 04/07/2017 05:53 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 05:49:15PM +0200, Christian Dersch wrote:
Yeah, that's fair. I'm not sure of a really good solution for this
other than ostree-based flatpaks — and that has its own challenges.
What would be the advantage of ostree-based flat
On 04/07/2017 05:40 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 10:32 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 02:29:02PM -, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
I had firefox-52.0-6.fc25 and there was no Delta RPM for firefox-52.0.2-2.fc25
Does Delta RPM is available only for th
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 05:49:15PM +0200, Christian Dersch wrote:
> >Yeah, that's fair. I'm not sure of a really good solution for this
> >other than ostree-based flatpaks — and that has its own challenges.
> What would be the advantage of ostree-based flatpak here?
Only changed files need to be a
On 04/07/2017 05:44 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 08:40:25AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
We have delta RPMs for going from GA release packages to current
updates and from last update to current update. Doing deltas from all
previous updates to all future updates would becom
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 08:40:25AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > We have delta RPMs for going from GA release packages to current
> > updates and from last update to current update. Doing deltas from all
> > previous updates to all future updates would become a crazy out of
> > control matrix v
On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 10:32 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 02:29:02PM -, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
> > I had firefox-52.0-6.fc25 and there was no Delta RPM for
> > firefox-52.0.2-2.fc25
> > Does Delta RPM is available only for the installed recent version?
>
> We ha
Your description was complete and convincing. That link you did provide is only
12.0MB !! it is really acceptable. Thank you
Fedora, Red Hat and RPM are really great!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email t
I had firefox-52.0-6.fc25 and there was no Delta RPM for firefox-52.0.2-2.fc25
Does Delta RPM is available only for the last installed version of software?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le..
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 02:29:02PM -, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
> I had firefox-52.0-6.fc25 and there was no Delta RPM for firefox-52.0.2-2.fc25
> Does Delta RPM is available only for the installed recent version?
We have delta RPMs for going from GA release packages to current
updates and
I had firefox-52.0-6.fc25 and there was no Delta RPM for firefox-52.0.2-2.fc25
Does Delta RPM is available only for the installed recent version?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fe
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 01:43:14PM -, Farhad Mohammadi_Majd wrote:
> Hello, Fedora like openSUSE and Ubuntu provides only Firefox rapid
> release, I want to known why there is no firefox-esr in the
> repository?
The general answer to this question for _any_ software is: "Because no
one who is
Hello, Fedora like openSUSE and Ubuntu provides only Firefox rapid release, I
want to known why there is no firefox-esr in the repository?
In Fedora v25, the size of firefox package is 84MB !! and there is no Delta RPM
for it to reduce the size of up-dates, because it is rapid release, its
life
16 matches
Mail list logo
