Re: Why libicu soname bump required harfbuzz package to be built twice?

2014-02-27 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi David, On Friday, 2014-02-14 17:48:42 +0100, David Tardon wrote: It was mainly a communication problem: I was prepared to handle the rebuilds, but when Eike did not ping me that he built new ICU, I assumed that he got hold of some other provenpackager :-( Ok, next time I'll explicitly

Re: Why libicu soname bump required harfbuzz package to be built twice?

2014-02-14 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 21:44:12 -0800 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: icu requires quite a large number of rebuilds, including some tricky ones (I just did tracker, which has to be bootstrapped, and libreoffice is another...), so I think it's reasonable to assume the icu maintainer

Re: Why libicu soname bump required harfbuzz package to be built twice?

2014-02-14 Thread David Tardon
Hi, On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 08:47:25AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 21:44:12 -0800 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: icu requires quite a large number of rebuilds, including some tricky ones (I just did tracker, which has to be bootstrapped, and libreoffice is

Re: Why libicu soname bump required harfbuzz package to be built twice?

2014-02-13 Thread Nils Philippsen
Hi, On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 20:19 -0800, Dan Mashal wrote: On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Parag N(पराग़) panem...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, From the yesterday's pkgs git commit logs I see 3-4 people built few packages for libicu soname bump. I am not sure why a single person can't carry

Re: Why libicu soname bump required harfbuzz package to be built twice?

2014-02-13 Thread Dan Mashal
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 4:49 AM, Nils Philippsen n...@redhat.com wrote: sorry for stepping on your toes -- it was late in the evening and there were three packages blocking my build, I simply overlooked that harfbuzz was rebuilt already (I checked the others in koji and no builds were

Re: Why libicu soname bump required harfbuzz package to be built twice?

2014-02-13 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 09:26 +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote: Hi, From the yesterday's pkgs git commit logs I see 3-4 people built few packages for libicu soname bump. I am not sure why a single person can't carry such a few package rebuilds for libicu soname bump. Whoever (people names)

Re: Why libicu soname bump required harfbuzz package to be built twice?

2014-02-13 Thread पराग़
Hi all, On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 5:18 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.comwrote: On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 09:26 +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote: Hi, From the yesterday's pkgs git commit logs I see 3-4 people built few packages for libicu soname bump. I am not sure why a single person

Re: Why libicu soname bump required harfbuzz package to be built twice?

2014-02-13 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2014-02-14 at 09:27 +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote: Hi all, On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 5:18 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 09:26 +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote: Hi, From the yesterday's pkgs git commit logs I see

Why libicu soname bump required harfbuzz package to be built twice?

2014-02-12 Thread पराग़
Hi, From the yesterday's pkgs git commit logs I see 3-4 people built few packages for libicu soname bump. I am not sure why a single person can't carry such a few package rebuilds for libicu soname bump. Whoever (people names) want to rebuild packages should announce on devel list first.

Re: Why libicu soname bump required harfbuzz package to be built twice?

2014-02-12 Thread Dan Mashal
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Parag N(पराग़) panem...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, From the yesterday's pkgs git commit logs I see 3-4 people built few packages for libicu soname bump. I am not sure why a single person can't carry such a few package rebuilds for libicu soname bump. Whoever