On 12/09/2016 11:17 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
For other software, where users would like the
version to match more closely the long lifecycle, maybe there could be
a hand-off from Fedora version to CentOS version.
Yeah, hand-offs would be a great feature for the users. Right now, it's
tricky to
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
> On Dec 9, 2016 5:18 PM, "Matthew Miller" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 11:07:32AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
>> > Anyways, in the big picture, while I don't speak for everyone on
On Dec 9, 2016 5:18 PM, "Matthew Miller" wrote:
On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 11:07:32AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> > Anyways, in the big picture, while I don't speak for everyone on
> > the Project Atomic side, I personally point users at CentOS first,
> > unless I have
On 9 December 2016 at 11:42, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-12-09 at 11:17 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 11:07:32AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
>> > > Anyways, in the big picture, while I don't speak for everyone on
>> > > the Project
On Fri, 2016-12-09 at 11:17 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 11:07:32AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> > > Anyways, in the big picture, while I don't speak for everyone on
> > > the Project Atomic side, I personally point users at CentOS
> > > first,
> > > unless I have some
On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 11:07:32AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> > Anyways, in the big picture, while I don't speak for everyone on
> > the Project Atomic side, I personally point users at CentOS first,
> > unless I have some reason to think they want Fedora. Something like
> > 80% of Fedora usage