On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 23:52, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
The obvious response here is 'so, package CruiseControl too!' If you
can't package CruiseControl, then you shouldn't package phpUnderControl;
it's frowned upon / not allowed (I can never remember which) to package
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 14:52 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 18:31 +0200, Christof Damian wrote:
Second question: I would love to have a meta package which brings all
of these packages ( phpunit, phpmd, phpcpd, phpdoc, phpcs, Mockery,
...) together and allows installation
James Antill wrote:
2. There's no way to do the groupremove operation, easily.
The groupremove operation is completely and utterly broken by design anyway:
1. It doesn't remove stuff which was independently dragged in by
dependencies of the packages in the group. So you'll be removing only the
On Fri, 2010-06-04 at 05:04 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
James Antill wrote:
2. There's no way to do the groupremove operation, easily.
The groupremove operation is completely and utterly broken by design anyway:
It doesn't act perfectly, in all cases, no.
[...]
Try groupremoving
I am reposting this from fedora php-devel list to get a bigger
audience. My questions are not that PHP specific:
I got two questions regarding my effort to package more of the php-qa
packages for fedora.
I have made a package for phpUnderControl now, but to use it you still
have to install
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 18:31 +0200, Christof Damian wrote:
I am reposting this from fedora php-devel list to get a bigger
audience. My questions are not that PHP specific:
Good, because neither are my answers =) I know nothing about the area in
question, so bear that in mind.
I got two
