Re: apt-fast

2010-01-18 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 01/18/2010 10:36 PM, Conrad Meyer wrote: > On Monday 18 January 2010 08:07:44 am Josephine Tannhäuser wrote: >> should be possible, we have an (old but we have one) apt > > I thought apt-rpm was broken since the rpm 4.7.x (or is that the right > version) changes? It was broken for quite a while

Re: apt-fast

2010-01-18 Thread Conrad Meyer
On Monday 18 January 2010 08:07:44 am Josephine Tannhäuser wrote: > should be possible, we have an (old but we have one) apt I thought apt-rpm was broken since the rpm 4.7.x (or is that the right version) changes? Regards, -- Conrad Meyer -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ht

Re: apt-fast

2010-01-18 Thread Panu Matilainen
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010, Seth Vidal wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Jan 2010, Josephine Tannhäuser wrote: > >> should be possible, we have an (old but we have one) apt >> > > unless I'm reading that forum thread wrong - it sure seems like apt-fast > requires axel's re

Re: apt-fast

2010-01-18 Thread Seth Vidal
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010, Josephine Tannhäuser wrote: should be possible, we have an (old but we have one) apt unless I'm reading that forum thread wrong - it sure seems like apt-fast requires axel's repo? If that's true then I think it nixes any chance of the pkg getting int

Re: apt-fast

2010-01-18 Thread Josephine Tannhäuser
should be possible, we have an (old but we have one) apt 2010/1/18, A. Mani : > See > http://www.pclinuxos.com/forum/index.php?PHPSESSID=3t030sj3bgqk77dgetcvtueji1&topic=66385.15 > > can it be packaged for Fedora? > > > Best > > A. Mani > > > -- > A. Mani > ASL, CLC, AMS, CMS > http://www.logicam

apt-fast

2010-01-18 Thread A. Mani
See http://www.pclinuxos.com/forum/index.php?PHPSESSID=3t030sj3bgqk77dgetcvtueji1&topic=66385.15 can it be packaged for Fedora? Best A. Mani -- A. Mani ASL, CLC, AMS, CMS http://www.logicamani.co.cc -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma