On 12/6/18 12:20 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
Hello,
systemd and nss-mdns packages modifies nsswitch.conf in their %post
scriptlets which creates conflicts with authselect on systems that are
configured by authselect. This needs to be solved somehow.
Originally, I wanted to create an authselect
On Mi, 12.12.18 10:10, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Acceptance is also not a problem, the point is integrating when and
> where it makes sense on Fedora.
Well, systemd is not a Fedora-only project. It's in fact an excercise
in unification across distros, and hence interfacing with upper
On Thu, 2018-12-06 at 17:49 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Do, 06.12.18 11:25, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > > > Summary: I'd make things simple, and enable all four unconditionally
> > > > and by default without any dynamic infrastructure, without postinst
> > > > scripts or
On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 06:58:31PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Friday, 07 December 2018 at 16:46, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 01:11:00PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> > wrote:
> > > On Thursday, 06 December 2018 at 15:10, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
On Friday, 07 December 2018 at 16:46, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 01:11:00PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
> > On Thursday, 06 December 2018 at 15:10, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > [...]
> > > The way myhostname is currently implemented, it is rather problematic.
>
On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 01:11:00PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Thursday, 06 December 2018 at 15:10, Florian Weimer wrote:
> [...]
> > The way myhostname is currently implemented, it is rather problematic.
> > I think it has largely stopped stomping over the DNS namespace
On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 01:11:00PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Thursday, 06 December 2018 at 15:10, Florian Weimer wrote:
> [...]
> > The way myhostname is currently implemented, it is rather problematic.
> > I think it has largely stopped stomping over the DNS namespace
On Thursday, 06 December 2018 at 15:10, Florian Weimer wrote:
[...]
> The way myhostname is currently implemented, it is rather problematic.
> I think it has largely stopped stomping over the DNS namespace (with the
> _gateway change), so it could be moved to the front, eliminating all
> those
On 12/6/18 3:27 PM, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 06/12/2018 14:11, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Tom Hughes:
Based on my experimentation with an F29 live image last week both
nss-systemd and nss-myhostname are in the default configuration.
Not in the file shipped by the glibc package.
Well something
On Do, 06.12.18 19:42, Florian Weimer (fwei...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >> Reading https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284325 there is can
> >> happen some ID overlaps with FreeIPA/Samba which is undesirable. I would
> >> say
> >> that this must be solves if this module is enabled by
* Lennart Poettering:
> On Do, 06.12.18 14:58, Pavel Březina (pbrez...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>> > Then there is nss-mymachines. It's primarily useful if
>> > systemd-machined or systemd-nspawn is used. Given that those are now
>> > part of the 'systemd-container' RPM it would be OK to also add
>>
On Do, 06.12.18 16:34, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
> > I wonder if we should think of a tighter system integration and subsume
> > the tasks of nss_machines into SSSD.
> > It would allow for detection and logging of UID conflicts should they
> > happen in a live system
On Do, 06.12.18 11:25, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > > Summary: I'd make things simple, and enable all four unconditionally
> > > and by default without any dynamic infrastructure, without postinst
> > > scripts or anything. If that's not acceptable, then at least two of the
> > > four
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 11:25:04AM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-12-06 at 16:00 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 02:36:36PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > On Do, 06.12.18 12:20, Pavel Březina (pbrez...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello,
On Thu, 2018-12-06 at 16:00 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 02:36:36PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Do, 06.12.18 12:20, Pavel Březina (pbrez...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> >
> > Heya!
> >
> > > systemd and nss-mdns packages modifies
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 02:36:36PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Do, 06.12.18 12:20, Pavel Březina (pbrez...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > Hello,
>
> Heya!
>
> > systemd and nss-mdns packages modifies nsswitch.conf in their %post
> > scriptlets which creates conflicts with authselect on
On Do, 06.12.18 14:58, Pavel Březina (pbrez...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > Then there is nss-mymachines. It's primarily useful if
> > systemd-machined or systemd-nspawn is used. Given that those are now
> > part of the 'systemd-container' RPM it would be OK to also add
> > nss-mymachines to
On 06/12/2018 14:11, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Tom Hughes:
Based on my experimentation with an F29 live image last week both
nss-systemd and nss-myhostname are in the default configuration.
Not in the file shipped by the glibc package.
Well something that has been installed as part of the
* Tom Hughes:
> Based on my experimentation with an F29 live image last week both
> nss-systemd and nss-myhostname are in the default configuration.
Not in the file shipped by the glibc package.
Florian
___
devel mailing list --
* Lennart Poettering:
> nss-myhostname should be in nsswitch.conf by default too. It's very
> minimal, and just makes sure the local hostname remains resolvable all
> the time. By enabling this, installers and image generators don't have
> to patch /etc/hosts anymore like they traditionally did,
On 12/6/18 2:36 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Do, 06.12.18 12:20, Pavel Březina (pbrez...@redhat.com) wrote:
Hello,
Heya!
systemd and nss-mdns packages modifies nsswitch.conf in their %post
scriptlets which creates conflicts with authselect on systems that are
configured by authselect.
On 12/6/18 1:31 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Pavel Březina:
systemd and nss-mdns packages modifies nsswitch.conf in their %post
scriptlets which creates conflicts with authselect on systems that are
configured by authselect. This needs to be solved somehow.
Other packagers (notably sssd) have
On 06/12/2018 13:36, Lennart Poettering wrote:
nss-systemd should be in nsswitch.conf by default. It's required for
systemd's DynamicUser=1 option to work correctly, and that's core
service functionality. Hence, given that systemd is Fedora's PID 1,
nss-systemd should also be in nsswitch.conf
On Do, 06.12.18 12:20, Pavel Březina (pbrez...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Hello,
Heya!
> systemd and nss-mdns packages modifies nsswitch.conf in their %post
> scriptlets which creates conflicts with authselect on systems that are
> configured by authselect. This needs to be solved somehow.
>
>
* Pavel Březina:
> systemd and nss-mdns packages modifies nsswitch.conf in their %post
> scriptlets which creates conflicts with authselect on systems that are
> configured by authselect. This needs to be solved somehow.
Other packagers (notably sssd) have made the required changes by
requesting
Hello,
systemd and nss-mdns packages modifies nsswitch.conf in their %post
scriptlets which creates conflicts with authselect on systems that are
configured by authselect. This needs to be solved somehow.
Originally, I wanted to create an authselect command that can be used by
packages on
26 matches
Mail list logo
