Re: b43: N-PHY

2010-04-16 Thread Bojan Smojver
Bastien Nocera redhat.com> writes: > Means that you'll need to use the proprietary driver for now. Look for > kmod-wl in RPMFusion. Yeah, seen that one but wasn't 100% sure. Thanks. OK, looking forward to the open source one in the coming months/years :-) -- Bojan -- devel mailing list deve

Re: b43: N-PHY

2010-04-16 Thread Bastien Nocera
- "Bojan Smojver" wrote: > Bastien Nocera redhat.com> writes: > > > The reverse engineering isn't complete, so the n-phy version of b43 > > isn't functional yet. > > OK, thanks for the info. > > Does that mean that the driver is usable with BCM4322 but won't go to > N speeds, > or does i

Re: b43: N-PHY

2010-04-15 Thread Bojan Smojver
Bastien Nocera redhat.com> writes: > The reverse engineering isn't complete, so the n-phy version of b43 > isn't functional yet. OK, thanks for the info. Does that mean that the driver is usable with BCM4322 but won't go to N speeds, or does it mean one needs to use proprietary Broadcom driver?

Re: b43: N-PHY

2010-04-15 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 18:20 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote: > Anyone knows what the status of these patches is when it comes to F-13 > and higher? > > I'm referring to: > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/1/37 > > Or more generally, whether the open source b43 driver knows how to drive > BCM4322 chips.

b43: N-PHY

2010-04-15 Thread Bojan Smojver
Anyone knows what the status of these patches is when it comes to F-13 and higher? I'm referring to: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/1/37 Or more generally, whether the open source b43 driver knows how to drive BCM4322 chips. -- Bojan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://a