Re: burning an iso with gnome defaults -> confusing

2010-02-02 Thread Rudolf Kastl
> I say we keep polling and find other ways of saving the planet. This is not about the change of default behaviour... keep on polling all the way you want... i just wanted to point out that the application gives confusing and partially wrong feedback to the user which confuses the user. Saving th

Re: burning an iso with gnome defaults -> confusing

2010-02-02 Thread Rudolf Kastl
2010/2/1 Christopher Brown : > On 15 January 2010 11:03, Rudolf Kastl wrote: >> 2010/1/14 Matthew Garrett : >>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 01:46:52PM +0100, Rudolf Kastl wrote: >>> thats exactly what i am "complaining" about. it states that burning failed. id expect it to tell me that polli

Re: burning an iso with gnome defaults -> confusing

2010-02-01 Thread Christopher Brown
On 15 January 2010 11:03, Rudolf Kastl wrote: > 2010/1/14 Matthew Garrett : >> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 01:46:52PM +0100, Rudolf Kastl wrote: >> >>> thats exactly what i am "complaining" about. it states that burning >>> failed. id expect it to tell me that polling failed. thats not really >>> "ran

Re: burning an iso with gnome defaults -> confusing

2010-01-31 Thread Jud Craft
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Rudolf Kastl wrote: > the ui is fine the text is misleading. You are correct. And they like it like that way. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: burning an iso with gnome defaults -> confusing

2010-01-15 Thread Rudolf Kastl
2010/1/14 Matthew Garrett : > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 01:46:52PM +0100, Rudolf Kastl wrote: > >> thats exactly what i am "complaining" about. it states that burning >> failed. id expect it to tell me that polling failed. thats not really >> "randomly" but  a common way to tune systems for maximized

Re: burning an iso with gnome defaults -> confusing

2010-01-14 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 01:46:52PM +0100, Rudolf Kastl wrote: > thats exactly what i am "complaining" about. it states that burning > failed. id expect it to tell me that polling failed. thats not really > "randomly" but a common way to tune systems for maximized battery > lifetime. powertop e.g.

Re: burning an iso with gnome defaults -> confusing

2010-01-14 Thread Rudolf Kastl
2010/1/14 Jud Craft : > On 1/14/10 6:30 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: >> On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 12:09 +0100, Rudolf Kastl wrote: >>> Hello >>> >>> Burning an iso file with gnome is really confusing even for a technical >>> user: >>> >>> 1. i insert a blank >>> 2. i right click on an iso in nautilus and

Re: burning an iso with gnome defaults -> confusing

2010-01-14 Thread Jud Craft
On 1/14/10 6:30 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 12:09 +0100, Rudolf Kastl wrote: >> Hello >> >> Burning an iso file with gnome is really confusing even for a technical user: >> >> 1. i insert a blank >> 2. i right click on an iso in nautilus and choose burn to cd/dvd >> >> -> so

Re: burning an iso with gnome defaults -> confusing

2010-01-14 Thread Rudolf Kastl
2010/1/14 Bastien Nocera : > On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 12:09 +0100, Rudolf Kastl wrote: >> Hello >> >> Burning an iso file with gnome is really confusing even for a technical user: >> >> 1. i insert a blank >> 2. i right click on an iso in nautilus and choose burn to cd/dvd >> >> -> so far so good >> >

Re: burning an iso with gnome defaults -> confusing

2010-01-14 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 12:09 +0100, Rudolf Kastl wrote: > Hello > > Burning an iso file with gnome is really confusing even for a technical user: > > 1. i insert a blank > 2. i right click on an iso in nautilus and choose burn to cd/dvd > > -> so far so good > > 3. i get a new window stating how

burning an iso with gnome defaults -> confusing

2010-01-14 Thread Rudolf Kastl
Hello Burning an iso file with gnome is really confusing even for a technical user: 1. i insert a blank 2. i right click on an iso in nautilus and choose burn to cd/dvd -> so far so good 3. i get a new window stating how much free space the blank has (but in reality it already substracted the s