On Sat, 2014-10-18 at 22:51 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> people not taking every single word personal in a technical dicussion
> would help everyone because the noise/information ratio would be much
> more appropriate
FWIW, it takes me literally 3-4x as long to read your emails as anyone
else'
On 10/18/2014 07:14 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 18.10.2014 um 09:10 schrieb Miroslav Suchy:
On 10/17/2014 08:31 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
You can say something like "I'm not sure I understand the point you are
making. Particularly, I don't see how __ follows. Can you
explain
that in
On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 23:18:12 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
> with my way communication is *much more* efficient
Empirical evidence, makes me disagree with this statement.
Effective communication includes understanding the human nature of your
interlocutor. But I understand you do not like that.
Go
Am 18.10.2014 um 23:07 schrieb Simo Sorce:
On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 22:51:52 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
They do not say something like:
"Sorry , I did not understand, can you repeat ?"
the say "bitte?" like "please" in english (one single word) but for
sure not "I'm not sure I understand the p
On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 22:51:52 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 18.10.2014 um 22:43 schrieb Simo Sorce:
> > On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 13:14:52 +0200
> > Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Am 18.10.2014 um 09:10 schrieb Miroslav Suchy:
> >>> On 10/17/2014 08:31 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> You c
Am 18.10.2014 um 22:43 schrieb Simo Sorce:
On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 13:14:52 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 18.10.2014 um 09:10 schrieb Miroslav Suchy:
On 10/17/2014 08:31 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
You can say something like "I'm not sure I understand the point
you are making. Particularly, I d
On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 13:14:52 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 18.10.2014 um 09:10 schrieb Miroslav Suchy:
> > On 10/17/2014 08:31 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> >> You can say something like "I'm not sure I understand the point
> >> you are making. Particularly, I don't see how __ follows.
Am 18.10.2014 um 17:10 schrieb Matthew Miller:
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 01:14:52PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Ha Ha. I heard exactly that from my English teacher several weeks ago.
For myself, this is cultural difference too. I would never use such
wording in my native language. (Disclaimer: I'
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 01:14:52PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >Ha Ha. I heard exactly that from my English teacher several weeks ago.
> >For myself, this is cultural difference too. I would never use such
> >wording in my native language. (Disclaimer: I'm not targeting the
> >original thread, bu
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 09:10:46AM +0200, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
> >And conversely, if you feel like your position isn't being listened
> >to, try "I guess I'm not making myself very clear. Let me try to
> >restate Does this make more sense?"
> Ha Ha. I heard exactly that from my English teacher
Am 18.10.2014 um 09:10 schrieb Miroslav Suchy:
On 10/17/2014 08:31 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
You can say something like "I'm not sure I understand the point you are
making. Particularly, I don't see how __ follows. Can you explain
that in more depth?"
And conversely, if you feel like y
On 10/17/2014 08:31 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
You can say something like "I'm not sure I understand the point you are
making. Particularly, I don't see how __ follows. Can you explain
that in more depth?"
And conversely, if you feel like your position isn't being listened to, try
"I gues
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 06:24:03PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >Everyone: please remember the code of conduct here, and advance the
> >conversation in a productive way or take it elsewhere. Thank you.
> Well, then please explain, how you expect people to express
> fundamental disagreement with s
13 matches
Mail list logo