On Mon, 2022-06-20 at 12:02 +0200, Lubomír Sedlář wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones píše v So 18. 06. 2022 v 12:08 +0100:
> > I thought I'd be nice and use a suffix for my side tag so it would
> > be
> > clear (not least to me!) which side tag was being used for the
> > OCaml
> > rebuild in Rawhide, but
Richard W.M. Jones píše v So 18. 06. 2022 v 12:08 +0100:
> I thought I'd be nice and use a suffix for my side tag so it would be
> clear (not least to me!) which side tag was being used for the OCaml
> rebuild in Rawhide, but ...
>
> $ fedpkg request-side-tag --help
> usage: fedpkg
On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 02:00:03PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 18/06/2022 13:47, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > So it sounds like the suffix is used for the purpose I guessed. Why
> > not let any packager use a descriptive suffix (without pre-approval)?
>
> +1. I like this idea.
On 18/06/2022 13:47, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
So it sounds like the suffix is used for the purpose I guessed. Why
not let any packager use a descriptive suffix (without pre-approval)?
+1. I like this idea.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 01:32:47PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 18/06/2022 13:08, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >I thought I'd be nice and use a suffix for my side tag so it would be
> >clear (not least to me!) which side tag was being used for the OCaml
> >rebuild in Rawhide, but ...
On 18/06/2022 13:08, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I thought I'd be nice and use a suffix for my side tag so it would be
clear (not least to me!) which side tag was being used for the OCaml
rebuild in Rawhide, but ...
You don't need any suffixes to perform a routine rebuild. Suffixes are
only
I thought I'd be nice and use a suffix for my side tag so it would be
clear (not least to me!) which side tag was being used for the OCaml
rebuild in Rawhide, but ...
$ fedpkg request-side-tag --help
usage: fedpkg request-side-tag [-h] [--base-tag BASE_TAG] [--suffix SUFFIX]
options:
-h,
