Hello,
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Because there are several ways how to resolve the dependency and DNF chose
> from them one which is confusing for humans:
> See
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485881
> Already
Non-optimal
On 08/24/2017 04:46 PM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
Hello,
For some reason I fail to understand, a non-devel package is
conflicting with a devel package :-/
According to dnf it's the only explicit conflict for the package:
$ dnf repoquery --conflicts firefox-55.0.2-2.fc26.x86_64
Dne 24.8.2017 v 16:46 Dridi Boukelmoune napsal(a):
Hello,
For some reason I fail to understand, a non-devel package is
conflicting with a devel package :-/
According to dnf it's the only explicit conflict for the package:
$ dnf repoquery --conflicts firefox-55.0.2-2.fc26.x86_64
Hello,
For some reason I fail to understand, a non-devel package is
conflicting with a devel package :-/
According to dnf it's the only explicit conflict for the package:
$ dnf repoquery --conflicts firefox-55.0.2-2.fc26.x86_64
pkgconfig(nspr) >= 4.16
Maybe someone confused Confli