2010/6/21 Pádraig Brady :
>
> Sorry I haven't been following this really, but I loath
> config options that aren't absolutely required, and this
> seems like a place where we could just stat() (cache) always.
> What's the problem with doing that?
I too would be really interested in any real-world
On 21/06/10 15:40, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
>>
>> I'm just gonna make NM use a local caching nameserver (which means
>> dnsmasq) by default at some point soon. People that don't want it can
>> turn it off.
>
> When thinking about this, there's
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> I'm just gonna make NM use a local caching nameserver (which means
> dnsmasq) by default at some point soon. People that don't want it can
> turn it off.
When thinking about this, there's a rather obvious patch here that
really should hav
On 06/20/2010 04:41 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2010/6/17 Bernie Innocenti :
>> Hello,
>>
>> xchat in Fedora needs to be restarted after switching to a different
>> nameserver or it fails to resolve.
>>
>> The xchat developers say that all xchat does is call gethostbyname(). A
> There was a topic
2010/6/17 Bernie Innocenti :
> Hello,
>
> xchat in Fedora needs to be restarted after switching to a different
> nameserver or it fails to resolve.
>
> The xchat developers say that all xchat does is call gethostbyname(). A
There was a topic 3 years ago about replacing gethostby* functions by
geta
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 09:59 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Stephen Gallagher
> wrote:
> >
> > Sorry, my reply was more directed against the assertion that NSCD should
> > be mandatory to solve this without changes to glibc. I agree that it
> > would be ideal for ge
On 06/18/2010 09:59 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Stephen Gallagher
> wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, my reply was more directed against the assertion that NSCD should
>> be mandatory to solve this without changes to glibc. I agree that it
>> would be ideal for gethostbyname() t
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> Sorry, my reply was more directed against the assertion that NSCD should
> be mandatory to solve this without changes to glibc. I agree that it
> would be ideal for gethostbyname() to internally perform a res_init()
> when appropriate.
On 06/18/2010 09:43 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Stephen Gallagher
> wrote:
>>
>> This is the entire purpose of the res_init() function in glibc. If your
>> application needs to be aware of a change in resolv.conf, you should be
>> monitoring it with inotify and cal
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> This is the entire purpose of the res_init() function in glibc. If your
> application needs to be aware of a change in resolv.conf, you should be
> monitoring it with inotify and calling res_init() anytime the file is
> changed.
That's
On 06/17/2010 06:05 PM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:41:27 -0400 Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>> xchat in Fedora needs to be restarted after switching to a different
>> nameserver or it fails to resolve.
>>
>> The xchat developers say that all xchat does is call gethostbyname().
>> A D
On 06/17/2010 05:41 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> Hello,
>
> xchat in Fedora needs to be restarted after switching to a different
> nameserver or it fails to resolve.
>
> The xchat developers say that all xchat does is call gethostbyname(). A
> Debian user told me that Debian carries a glibc patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> Hello,
>
> xchat in Fedora needs to be restarted after switching to a different
> nameserver or it fails to resolve.
>
> The xchat developers say that all xchat does is call gethostbyname(). A
> Debian user told me that Debi
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:41:27 -0400 Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> xchat in Fedora needs to be restarted after switching to a different
> nameserver or it fails to resolve.
>
> The xchat developers say that all xchat does is call gethostbyname().
> A Debian user told me that Debian carries a glibc patch
nscd and sssd exist in part exactly to address this issue.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> "BI" == Bernie Innocenti writes:
BI> A Debian user told me that Debian carries a glibc patch to make
BI> processes notice resolv.conf updates and reload it. Is there any
BI> chance we could apply the same patch in Fedora too? I don't know all
BI> the details, but I guess there might be a g
Hello,
xchat in Fedora needs to be restarted after switching to a different
nameserver or it fails to resolve.
The xchat developers say that all xchat does is call gethostbyname(). A
Debian user told me that Debian carries a glibc patch to make processes
notice resolv.conf updates and reload it.
17 matches
Mail list logo
