Re: glibc fix to allow instlangs to really work -- too late for f22?

2015-03-23 Thread Carlos O'Donell
On 03/23/2015 11:06 AM, Carlos O'Donell wrote: On 03/18/2015 09:05 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: As discussed the change has no impact on code, it's entirely a packaging change, which carries it's own risks, but the same kind of risks as a runtime change. Only users running with kickstart --instLangs

Re: glibc fix to allow instlangs to really work -- too late for f22?

2015-03-23 Thread Carlos O'Donell
On 03/18/2015 09:05 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org wrote: On 18/03/15 11:55, Josh Boyer wrote: On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: The glibc team has a fix for a longstanding issue, which is

Re: glibc fix to allow instlangs to really work -- too late for f22?

2015-03-18 Thread Paul Howarth
On 18/03/15 11:55, Josh Boyer wrote: On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: The glibc team has a fix for a longstanding issue, which is that instlangs hasn't worked in the installer. This means that in a minimal image of about 400MB, 100MB is translation

Re: glibc fix to allow instlangs to really work -- too late for f22?

2015-03-18 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: The glibc team has a fix for a longstanding issue, which is that instlangs hasn't worked in the installer. This means that in a minimal image of about 400MB, 100MB is translation information. (Of course we want

Re: glibc fix to allow instlangs to really work -- too late for f22?

2015-03-18 Thread Josh Boyer
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org wrote: On 18/03/15 11:55, Josh Boyer wrote: On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: The glibc team has a fix for a longstanding issue, which is that instlangs hasn't worked in the

Re: glibc fix to allow instlangs to really work -- too late for f22?

2015-03-18 Thread Siddhesh Poyarekar
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:53:50AM +, Peter Robinson wrote: In the cloud and docker images, we've been carrying horribly hacks (really, horrible) to strip this out ofter the fact. The new fix would let us get the same effect the right way. I'm told that this is a low-risk change and

glibc fix to allow instlangs to really work -- too late for f22?

2015-03-18 Thread Matthew Miller
The glibc team has a fix for a longstanding issue, which is that instlangs hasn't worked in the installer. This means that in a minimal image of about 400MB, 100MB is translation information. (Of course we want Fedora to be international, but there are many cases like Docker containers where no

Re: glibc fix to allow instlangs to really work -- too late for f22?

2015-03-18 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 09:05:35 -0400 Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Ah, from yesterday. I hadn't seen that yet. I hope it does, because I have things to build in Rawhide COPRs :). Still, I would suggest waiting at least a few days to see if there is any other fallout before we

Re: glibc fix to allow instlangs to really work -- too late for f22?

2015-03-18 Thread Haïkel
My 2cts as Cloud SIG member is that we shouldn't wait for F23 as long as it's ready for beta or even shortly before. This is not just an annoyance, this is an huge impediment toward successful cloud product. I kindly ask fesco to take this into consideration Regards, H. -- devel mailing list

Re: glibc fix to allow instlangs to really work -- too late for f22?

2015-03-18 Thread Josh Boyer
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: The glibc team has a fix for a longstanding issue, which is that instlangs hasn't worked in the installer. This means that in a minimal image of about 400MB, 100MB is translation information. (Of course we want