Re: glibc redefines SIGSTKSZ and MINSTKSZ (Re: pagure pushed to stress-ng (rawhide). "Fix build with glibc 2.34 (..more)")

2021-02-25 Thread Florian Weimer
* Tomasz Kłoczko: > Is it not kind of a mistake in case of glibc to introduce such > changes? (just asking to only have confirmation that it was not actual > mistake and not to start another flame) We don't have a choice. The old interfaces are simply incompatible with modern hardware. CPUs

glibc redefines SIGSTKSZ and MINSTKSZ (Re: pagure pushed to stress-ng (rawhide). "Fix build with glibc 2.34 (..more)")

2021-02-25 Thread Tomasz Kłoczko
On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 at 10:52, wrote: > Notification time stamped 2021-02-25 10:17:40 UTC > > From a9bc8b5947d10f13996e6e5d7280e5860473bbd4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Yaakov Selkowitz > Date: Feb 25 2021 03:05:37 + > Subject: Fix build with glibc 2.34 > > >