Is it needed to build any packages in the main Fedora repo? If not, then
why not just make a COPR for it instead of putting it in the mainline repos.
-Ian
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 1:42 PM Frantisek Zatloukal
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 12:47 PM Leigh Scott
> wrote:
>
>> > Please don't revi
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 12:47 PM Leigh Scott
wrote:
> > Please don't revive ancient, unmaintained, security-critical libraries
> > for use with proprietary software not distributed by Fedora
> Old gstreamer is used by a couple of ancient apps in fedora (banshee)
>
Banshee in Fedora is using
> Please don't revive ancient, unmaintained, security-critical libraries
> for use with proprietary software not distributed by Fedora
Old gstreamer is used by a couple of ancient apps in fedora (banshee) and
isn't installed by default so I fail to see how you class it as
'security-critical
On Thursday, 21 November 2019 at 17:17, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> Please don't revive ancient, unmaintained, security-critical libraries for
> use with proprietary software not distributed by Fedora
Well, it's useful at least for two other people and I don't see any CVE
bugs open against t
Please don't revive ancient, unmaintained, security-critical libraries
for use with proprietary software not distributed by Fedora
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorapro
On Thursday, 21 November 2019 at 13:41, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thursday, 22 August 2019 at 15:04, Tom Callaway wrote:
> > I'm hoping that this one hasn't been dead for 8 weeks, because all it needs
> > to get it building again is to disable the gtk-doc generation...
> >
On Wednesday, 25 September 2019 at 10:45, Kalev Lember wrote:
>
> On 9/24/19 14:50, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 9:04 am, Tom Callaway wrote:
> > > or know of some reason it shouldn't be brought back
> >
> > Well this looks like gstreamer 0.10. I'm really surprised we sti
Hi,
On Thursday, 22 August 2019 at 15:04, Tom Callaway wrote:
> I'm hoping that this one hasn't been dead for 8 weeks, because all it needs
> to get it building again is to disable the gtk-doc generation...
>
> I don't really want to own it, but I have dependent packages, so if no one
> else does
On 9/24/19 14:50, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 9:04 am, Tom Callaway wrote:
or know of some reason it shouldn't be brought back
Well this looks like gstreamer 0.10. I'm really surprised we still have
this in the distro. It's been obsolete for the better part of a decade
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 9:04 am, Tom Callaway
wrote:
or know of some reason it shouldn't be brought back
Well this looks like gstreamer 0.10. I'm really surprised we still have
this in the distro. It's been obsolete for the better part of a decade
and is probably filled with security bugs. I
rpmfusion dropped support for gstreamer when it was retired,
Banshee is not going to be a nice experience for users if there are no codecs
to play stuff.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...
* Tom Callaway [22/08/2019 09:04] :
>
> I don't really want to own it, but I have dependent packages, so if no one
> else does, I will claim it.
Since this one is back, I'm planning to unretire perl-GStreamer and
perl-GStreamer-Interfaces, which depended on this.
Emmanuel
I'm hoping that this one hasn't been dead for 8 weeks, because all it needs
to get it building again is to disable the gtk-doc generation...
I don't really want to own it, but I have dependent packages, so if no one
else does, I will claim it.
If you want it (or know of some reason it shouldn't b
13 matches
Mail list logo
