On Tue, 2019-12-03 at 15:15 -0500, Ben Rosser wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 3:18 AM Tom Hughes wrote:
> > Ben Rosser was working on sorting out grunt. In fact I believe he
> > took the first of those at least.
> >
> > Tom
> >
> > On 03/12/2019 07:45, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > > According to [1],
On Tue, 2019-12-03 at 19:34 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-12-03 at 08:18 +, Tom Hughes wrote:
> > Ben Rosser was working on sorting out grunt. In fact I believe he
> > took the first of those at least.
>
> OK then I taking nodejs-load-grunt-tasks [1]
I need a provenpackager that d
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 3:18 AM Tom Hughes wrote:
>
> Ben Rosser was working on sorting out grunt. In fact I believe he
> took the first of those at least.
>
> Tom
>
> On 03/12/2019 07:45, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > According to [1], these are the packages which need to be preserved to
> > keep js-jque
On Tue, 2019-12-03 at 08:18 +, Tom Hughes wrote:
> Ben Rosser was working on sorting out grunt. In fact I believe he
> took the first of those at least.
OK then I taking nodejs-load-grunt-tasks [1]
[1]
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9077
> Tom
>
> On 03/12/2019 07:45, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >
I have taken nodejs-raw-body and am pushing an updated version to rawhide
now.
-Jared
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 2:53 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> According to [1], these are the packages which need to be preserved to
> keep js-jquery around:
>
>
> nodejs-grunt-legacy-util
>
> nodejs-load-grunt-tasks
>
Ben Rosser was working on sorting out grunt. In fact I believe he
took the first of those at least.
Tom
On 03/12/2019 07:45, Vít Ondruch wrote:
According to [1], these are the packages which need to be preserved to
keep js-jquery around:
nodejs-grunt-legacy-util
nodejs-load-grunt-tasks
node
According to [1], these are the packages which need to be preserved to
keep js-jquery around:
nodejs-grunt-legacy-util
nodejs-load-grunt-tasks
nodejs-raw-body
Vít
[1] https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2019-12-02.txt
Dne 03. 12. 19 v 2:24 Sérgio Basto napsal(a):
> I will take nod
I will take nodejs-dateformat .
Do you have a list of what more packages we have to keep?
On Mon, 2019-12-02 at 15:52 +0100, Raphael Groner wrote:
> Thanks a lot.
>
> Am 02.12.19 um 15:20 schrieb Tom Hughes:
> …
> > As I explained the other day js-jquery was dependent on a
> > nodejs module (a n
Thanks a lot.
Am 02.12.19 um 15:20 schrieb Tom Hughes:
…
As I explained the other day js-jquery was dependent on a
nodejs module (a normal one, not modularised) which was
failing to build and which I have now fixed.
…
___
devel mailing list -- devel@l
On 02/12/2019 14:04, Raphael Groner wrote:
> I don't think modularity is to blame here.
Nah. The dependent nodejs stack broke away due to move into modularity
worlds.
No, it didn't.
I'm no fan of modularity but there is no need to blame it
for things it is not responsible for.
As I explaine
> I don't think modularity is to blame here.
Nah. The dependent nodejs stack broke away due to move into modularity
worlds.
> 3) since the bundling policy is relaxed, everybody just bundles with
zero motivation to maintain package for somebody else.
Ack. The unbundling of js-jsquery has been a
Dne 28. 11. 19 v 19:43 Raphael Groner napsal(a):
> Hi,
>
> in case of my packages, jpype and pyvirtualize, I'd say to skip
> generation of documentation while js-jquery is b0rken.
>
> What's the issue about js-jquery? I tend to blame modularity due to
> nodejs-*.
I don't think modularity is to b
Hi,
in case of my packages, jpype and pyvirtualize, I'd say to skip
generation of documentation while js-jquery is b0rken.
What's the issue about js-jquery? I tend to blame modularity due to
nodejs-*.
Just my 5ct.
Regards, Raphael
Am 28.11.19 um 14:05 schrieb Miro Hrončok:
Dear maintainers.
13 matches
Mail list logo
