Re: koji: kernel-2.6.40-3.fc15

2011-07-30 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 13:53 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=256138 > > does this mean that F15 will get a rebased 2.6.40 sooner or > later in stable repos to avoid troubles with the new versioning > and will not stuck at 2.6.38 the whole life cycl

Re: koji: kernel-2.6.40-3.fc15

2011-07-30 Thread Genes MailLists
On 07/30/2011 12:52 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 30.07.2011 04:29, schrieb Genes MailLists: >> wasn't there some kind of issue in vm's ? >> Maybe I'm not remembering correctly > > no - performance sucks if the VM is stored on a BTRFS formatted disk > this is a completly other problem and it

Re: koji: kernel-2.6.40-3.fc15

2011-07-30 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 30.07.2011 04:16, schrieb Dave Jones: > On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 01:16:43AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > i have running 2.6.40-4.fc15.x86_64 #1 SMP in my testing-virtual-machine > since > > some minutes, boot looked fine, after a minute a got a btrfs-stack-trace > > > > hope this he

Re: koji: kernel-2.6.40-3.fc15

2011-07-29 Thread Genes MailLists
On 07/29/2011 10:41 PM, Dave Jones wrote: > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:29:58PM -0400, Genes MailLists wrote: > > > wasn't there some kind of issue in vm's ? Maybe I'm not remembering > > correctly. > > too vague to comment. there are always 'issues in vm's :) Ha ha .. actually I have a fee

Re: koji: kernel-2.6.40-3.fc15

2011-07-29 Thread Dave Jones
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:29:58PM -0400, Genes MailLists wrote: > wasn't there some kind of issue in vm's ? Maybe I'm not remembering > correctly. too vague to comment. there are always 'issues in vm's :) > Dave - how is the 2.6.40 code different or not from 3.0.0-2 ? pretty much the same

Re: koji: kernel-2.6.40-3.fc15

2011-07-29 Thread Genes MailLists
On 07/29/2011 10:16 PM, Dave Jones wrote: > On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 01:16:43AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > i have running 2.6.40-4.fc15.x86_64 #1 SMP in my testing-virtual-machine > since > > some minutes, boot looked fine, after a minute a got a btrfs-stack-trace > > > > hope this hel

Re: koji: kernel-2.6.40-3.fc15

2011-07-29 Thread Dave Jones
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 01:16:43AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > i have running 2.6.40-4.fc15.x86_64 #1 SMP in my testing-virtual-machine > since > some minutes, boot looked fine, after a minute a got a btrfs-stack-trace > > hope this helps (no i do not tend use btrfs in production *gg*) h

Re: koji: kernel-2.6.40-3.fc15

2011-07-29 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 29.07.2011 19:39, schrieb Josh Boyer: > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=256138 >> >> does this mean that F15 will get a rebased 2.6.40 sooner or >> later in stable repos to avoid troubles with the new versioning >>

Re: koji: kernel-2.6.40-3.fc15

2011-07-29 Thread Josh Boyer
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=256138 > > does this mean that F15 will get a rebased 2.6.40 sooner or > later in stable repos to avoid troubles with the new versioning > and will not stuck at 2.6.38 the whole life cycle?

Re: koji: kernel-2.6.40-3.fc15

2011-07-29 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
* Reindl Harald [29/07/2011 15:58] : > > does this mean that F15 will get a rebased 2.6.40 sooner or > later in stable repos to avoid troubles with the new versioning > and will not stuck at 2.6.38 the whole life cycle? Yes. https://plus.google.com/106327083461132854143/posts/SbnL3KaVRtM Emmanuel

koji: kernel-2.6.40-3.fc15

2011-07-29 Thread Reindl Harald
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=256138 does this mean that F15 will get a rebased 2.6.40 sooner or later in stable repos to avoid troubles with the new versioning and will not stuck at 2.6.38 the whole life cycle? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- d