Hi,
On Wed, 2017-11-01 at 14:56 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Do you know that LGPLv2.1 is wrong license tag in Fedora[0]?
Nope, I do not. Thanks for the pointer.
> You should use LGPLv2+ or MPLv2.0
They do not say "and later", thus the current LGPLv2 is more accurate.
I'm going to corr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, 2017-11-01 at 12:58 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> Hello,
> with the update to libical 3.0.0 the sources changed the license from
> LGPLv2 or MPLv1.1 to LGPLv2.1 or MPLv2.0, as mentioned in the
> upstream
> list here:
> http://lists.infrade
Hello,
with the update to libical 3.0.0 the sources changed the license from
LGPLv2 or MPLv1.1 to LGPLv2.1 or MPLv2.0, as mentioned in the upstream
list here:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/libical-devel/2017-May/000764.html
Bye,
Milan
