On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 05:55:16PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sat, 2018-05-19 at 15:08 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 02:38:13PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2018-05-18 at 17:54 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > > > > > > > > "ES" ==
On Sat, 2018-05-19 at 15:08 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 02:38:13PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Fri, 2018-05-18 at 17:54 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > > > > > > > "ES" == Eric Smith writes:
> > >
> > > ES> What macro(s)
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 02:38:13PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-05-18 at 17:54 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > > > > > > "ES" == Eric Smith writes:
> >
> > ES> What macro(s) should I use in an RPM spec to refer to a directory
> > ES> like
On Fri, 2018-05-18 at 17:54 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > > > > > "ES" == Eric Smith writes:
>
> ES> What macro(s) should I use in an RPM spec to refer to a directory
> ES> like /usr/lib/modules-load.d, which is under /usr/lib even if
> libdir
> ES> is /usr/lib64?
> "ES" == Eric Smith writes:
ES> What macro(s) should I use in an RPM spec to refer to a directory
ES> like /usr/lib/modules-load.d, which is under /usr/lib even if libdir
ES> is /usr/lib64? Is there something better than
ES> %{_usr}/lib/modules-load.d?
It seems that
What macro(s) should I use in an RPM spec to refer to a directory like
/usr/lib/modules-load.d, which is under /usr/lib even if libdir is
/usr/lib64? Is there something better than %{_usr}/lib/modules-load.d?
___
devel mailing list --