On Mon, 26 Oct, 2015 at 12:49:23 GMT, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> * New variables: $(MAKE_TERMOUT) and $(MAKE_TERMERR) are set to non-empty
> values if stdout or stderr, respectively, are believed to be writing to a
> terminal. These variables are exported by default.
Hrm. This
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/25/2015 06:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-10-25 at 19:53 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:07:47 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>> wrote:
>>> I built 4.1 for rawhide. If that checks out to be OK, I can
>>>
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> In this case it is worth looking at the actual changelog for 4.1:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2014-10/msg0.html
> The list of new features is:
>
> * New variables: $(MAKE_TERMOUT) and $(MAKE_TERMERR) are set to non-empty
> values if
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 08:37:05AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/25/2015 06:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Sun, 2015-10-25 at 19:53 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> >> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:07:47 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> On Oct 25, 2015 12:53, "Jan Kratochvil" wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:07:47 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> > I built 4.1 for rawhide. If that checks out to be OK, I
On 10/26/2015 05:21 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Oct 25, 2015 12:53, "Jan Kratochvil" wrote:
On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:07:47 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
I built 4.1 for rawhide.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:21 PM, drago01 wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Stephen John Smoogen
> wrote:
> >
> > On Oct 25, 2015 12:53, "Jan Kratochvil"
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:07:47 +0200, Zbigniew
On Sun, 2015-10-25 at 19:53 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:07:47 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > I built 4.1 for rawhide. If that checks out to be OK, I can push
> > an update for F23 also.
>
> I do not understand why a major rebase could be permitted after
On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:07:47 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> I built 4.1 for rawhide. If that checks out to be OK, I can push
> an update for F23 also.
I do not understand why a major rebase could be permitted after all the F-23
freezing stages? It may cause FTBFSes or even broken
On Oct 25, 2015 12:53, "Jan Kratochvil" wrote:
>
> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:07:47 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > I built 4.1 for rawhide. If that checks out to be OK, I can push
> > an update for F23 also.
>
> I do not understand why a major rebase could be
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Jan Kratochvil
wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:07:47 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > I built 4.1 for rawhide. If that checks out to be OK, I can push
> > an update for F23 also.
>
> I do not understand why a major rebase
Hi. I think the current one is still 4.1
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 4.1 was released one year ago: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1150488
> Can anyone update it ?
>
> -thanks-
> --
> devel mailing list
>
Am 24.10.2015 um 19:45 schrieb Craig Garner:
Hi. I think the current one is still 4.1
no idea what you try to tell us when we have "make-4.0-3.1.fc22.x86_64"
and 4.1 was released a year ago without making it into Fedora
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez
Hi,
4.1 was released one year ago: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1150488
Can anyone update it ?
-thanks-
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Reindl Harald
wrote:
>
>
> Am 24.10.2015 um 19:45 schrieb Craig Garner:
>
>> Hi. I think the current one is still 4.1
>>
>
> no idea what you try to tell us when we have "make-4.0-3.1.fc22.x86_64"
> and 4.1 was released a year ago without
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 07:44:01PM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 4.1 was released one year ago: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1150488
> Can anyone update it ?
Indeed, it seems unmaintaned in Fedora.
I built 4.1 for rawhide. If that checks out to be OK, I can push
an update for F23
16 matches
Mail list logo