Re: msp430mcu: To -devel or not to -devel

2012-05-23 Thread Rob Spanton
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 14:48 +0100, Rob Spanton wrote So I'd like to submit a new msp430mcu package for review. I've now submitted this for review. Thanks for the feedback everyone. It'd be great if someone could find the time to review it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824478

Re: msp430mcu: To -devel or not to -devel

2012-05-20 Thread Kevin Kofler
Rob Spanton wrote: rpmlint doesn't seem to be very happy about me shipping this rpm that contains a lot of headers. So unhappy that it tells me 454 times about it ;-) Compiler toolchains are exempt from the -devel package requirement, as are target libraries for cross-compilation (see e.g.

msp430mcu: To -devel or not to -devel

2012-05-18 Thread Rob Spanton
Hi, I'm working on bringing the msp430 cross-compilation toolchain up-to-date. About a year ago, the mspgcc project made a big jump forwards and this has changed some things about how the project works. There's a C library for the msp430 micro-controllers called msp430-libc. This used to

Re: msp430mcu: To -devel or not to -devel

2012-05-18 Thread Thibault North
Hi, On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Rob Spanton rspan...@zepler.net wrote: Hi, [...] So I'd like to submit a new msp430mcu package for review.  This package would almost entirely consist of headers and linker scripts. Since this package would be essential for cross-compiling *anything* for

Re: msp430mcu: To -devel or not to -devel

2012-05-18 Thread Przemek Klosowski
On 05/18/2012 09:48 AM, Rob Spanton wrote: Hi, I'm working on bringing the msp430 cross-compilation toolchain up-to-date. About a year ago, the mspgcc project made a big jump forwards and this has changed some things about how the project works. Excellent, thanks! are you also doing