On Tue, 2019-07-16 at 06:37 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 5:34 AM Björn 'besser82' Esser
> wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, den 16.07.2019, 00:20 +0200 schrieb Kevin Kofler:
> > > Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > > gnutls now cannot be rebuilt:
> > > >
> > > > nothing provides libnett
Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
> Which even then would still remain an issue, as cryptsetup build-
> requires device-mapper-devel, which requires systemd for some unknown
> reason…
My idea is that the minimal buildroot should contain a fake package that
Obsoletes and Provides: systemd. Maybe it ca
Am Dienstag, den 16.07.2019, 19:49 +0200 schrieb Kevin Kofler:
> Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
> > We have a circular dependency in the minimal buildroot:
> >
> > systemd --> cryptsetup-libs --> json-c
> >
> >
> > cryptsetup needs json-c for LUKS2 and there is no option to disable
> > LUKS2
Am Dienstag, den 16.07.2019, 19:26 +0200 schrieb Nicolas Mailhot via
devel:
> Le mardi 16 juillet 2019 à 18:53 +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser a
> écrit :
> >
> > Which build chain does look cleaner, shorter, and more semantically
> > correct?
> >
> > 1. systemd (no cryptsetup) --> json-c (new s
Am Dienstag, den 16.07.2019, 20:45 +0200 schrieb Igor Gnatenko:
> Because of systemd-libs… It is a dependency of util-linux at least.
> That ships logger and lslogins utilities which link against
> libsystemd.
Which I assume are not really useful nor needed in a minimal buildroot?
signature.asc
Because of systemd-libs… It is a dependency of util-linux at least.
That ships logger and lslogins utilities which link against
libsystemd.
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 8:42 PM Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
> > We have a circular dependency in the minimal buildroot:
> >
> > s
Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
> We have a circular dependency in the minimal buildroot:
>
> systemd --> cryptsetup-libs --> json-c
>
>
> cryptsetup needs json-c for LUKS2 and there is no option to disable
> LUKS2 during build.
>
> However systemd can *possibly* be build without support for
Le mardi 16 juillet 2019 à 18:53 +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser a
écrit :
>
>
> Which build chain does look cleaner, shorter, and more semantically
> correct?
>
> 1. systemd (no cryptsetup) --> json-c (new so-ver) --> cryptsetup
> --> systemd (with cryptsetup) --> other consumers in chai
Am Dienstag, den 16.07.2019, 12:00 +0200 schrieb Kevin Kofler:
> Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
>
> > Am Dienstag, den 16.07.2019, 00:20 +0200 schrieb Kevin Kofler:
> > > Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > > gnutls now cannot be rebuilt:
> > > >
> > > > nothing provides libnettle.so.6 needed by gnutls-3.6.
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos writes:
> The latest nettle (3.5.1) update will break ABI on rawhide. The API
> remains the same hence recompilation will be sufficient to address any
> issues.
Thanks to the suggestion from Miro, the new nettle and gnutls built
against it are now in rawhide. I am using
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 5:34 AM Björn 'besser82' Esser
wrote:
>
> Am Dienstag, den 16.07.2019, 00:20 +0200 schrieb Kevin Kofler:
> > Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > gnutls now cannot be rebuilt:
> > >
> > > nothing provides libnettle.so.6 needed by gnutls-3.6.8-
> > > 1.fc31.armv7hl
> >
> > Don't you lo
Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 16.07.2019, 00:20 +0200 schrieb Kevin Kofler:
>> Miro Hrončok wrote:
>> > gnutls now cannot be rebuilt:
>> >
>> > nothing provides libnettle.so.6 needed by gnutls-3.6.8-
>> > 1.fc31.armv7hl
>>
>> Don't you love circular dependencies?
>>
>> This i
Am Dienstag, den 16.07.2019, 00:20 +0200 schrieb Kevin Kofler:
> Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > gnutls now cannot be rebuilt:
> >
> > nothing provides libnettle.so.6 needed by gnutls-3.6.8-
> > 1.fc31.armv7hl
>
> Don't you love circular dependencies?
>
> This is really the biggest issue that we have: T
The builsystem should rebuild all the other participants in the cycle against
the new link, then rebuild the new link against the updated cycle, then rebuild
again the rest of the cycle against the new link
If that fails, attempt to do the same with a bootstrap pass, hoping one of the
cycle par
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> gnutls now cannot be rebuilt:
>
> nothing provides libnettle.so.6 needed by gnutls-3.6.8-1.fc31.armv7hl
Don't you love circular dependencies?
This is really the biggest issue that we have: There are more and more
circular dependencies. Each of them is a major PITA when try
Neal Gompa wrote:
> I know it’s beating a dead horse, but I’d rather have the buildsystem
> *deal* with such a trivial problem than require manual intervention.
> Cycling through and building things properly in order to deal with a
> soname bump is something our tooling should do for us.
And how i
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 9:45 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 2:48 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > On 15. 07. 19 13:54, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > On 15. 07. 19 13:24, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > >> On 15. 07. 19 12:41, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> > >>> Hi,
> > >>> The lates
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 2:48 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 15. 07. 19 13:54, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 15. 07. 19 13:24, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >> On 15. 07. 19 12:41, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>> The latest nettle (3.5.1) update will break ABI on rawhide. The API
> >>> remains
On 15. 07. 19 13:54, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 15. 07. 19 13:24, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 15. 07. 19 12:41, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
Hi,
The latest nettle (3.5.1) update will break ABI on rawhide. The API
remains the same hence recompilation will be sufficient to address any
issues.
Nearl
On 15. 07. 19 13:24, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 15. 07. 19 12:41, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
Hi,
The latest nettle (3.5.1) update will break ABI on rawhide. The API
remains the same hence recompilation will be sufficient to address any
issues.
Nearly all of my packages now fail to resolve b
On 15. 07. 19 12:41, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
Hi,
The latest nettle (3.5.1) update will break ABI on rawhide. The API
remains the same hence recompilation will be sufficient to address any
issues.
Nearly all of my packages now fail to resolve because of:
nothing provides libnettle.so.
On 15. 07. 19 12:41, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
Hi,
The latest nettle (3.5.1) update will break ABI on rawhide. The API
remains the same hence recompilation will be sufficient to address any
issues.
I've recently seen an Arch Linux user ranting about this particular update on
Twitter.
Hi,
The latest nettle (3.5.1) update will break ABI on rawhide. The API
remains the same hence recompilation will be sufficient to address any
issues.
regards,
Nikos
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email t
23 matches
Mail list logo