Re: new packages review tickets

2020-05-31 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
Thanks for all the comments and ideas you posted. I have opened a pull request [1] to automate some of the processes against review-stats. If accepted it will: - Set NEEDINFO against submitter on tickets not assigned and not updated for more than one year - Set NEEDINFO against reviewer on

Re: new packages review tickets

2020-05-30 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 12:45:56PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > -1 > I had phase of life when I worked on these archaeologic tickets. I even > managed to process eight years old ticket! > Yes, for most tickets it was: Ping! Wait one month. Than one more gentle > Ping! And if submitter does

Re: new packages review tickets

2020-05-29 Thread Jason Tibbitts
I'll apologize in advance for rambling, but I've been kicking around ideas in this space for very many years now. > "SJS" == Stephen John Smoogen writes: SJS> Well it is quite clear we are doing something wrong and have been SJS> for as long as the project has been going on. It's true that

Re: new packages review tickets

2020-05-28 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
Il 28/05/20 19:04, Fabio Valentini ha scritto: > > Since bugzilla keeps track of which user set which flag, do you maybe > need to specify which user's needinfo flag you want to clear? > > Fabio > I'm already passing all the flag object properties, id included: >>> bug = bz.getbug(1730464) >>>

Re: new packages review tickets

2020-05-28 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 6:58 PM Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > > Il 24/05/20 15:41, Igor Raits ha scritto: > > > > This is great idea! If you need any help with bugzilla API or anything > > like that - let me know. > > > > > Yeah, I think I need some help in getting flags resetted. > > I would

Re: new packages review tickets

2020-05-28 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
Il 24/05/20 15:41, Igor Raits ha scritto: > > This is great idea! If you need any help with bugzilla API or anything > like that - let me know. > > Yeah, I think I need some help in getting flags resetted. I would like to reset the 'needinfo' flag and the 'fedora-review' flag. Accordingly to

Re: new packages review tickets

2020-05-27 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Wed, 27 May 2020 at 10:35, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 12:45:56PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > It may sounds appealing to clean the plate and "resolve" a lot of > > tickets. However, think about it from the other side: somebody is > > waiting for review

Re: new packages review tickets

2020-05-27 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 12:45:56PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > It may sounds appealing to clean the plate and "resolve" a lot of > tickets. However, think about it from the other side: somebody is > waiting for review for years, then a ping will come, and if he > responds, then ... nothing.

Re: new packages review tickets

2020-05-27 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 24. 05. 20 v 10:02 Mattia Verga via devel napsal(a): > - following the Policy for stalled package reviews [1], I would like to > mass comment on tickets submitted before 1/1/2017 (more than 3 years > old) asking the submitter if they're still interested in continue with > the review process

Re: new packages review tickets

2020-05-26 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
Il 26/05/20 14:33, Ben Cotton ha scritto: > > I like it. I'm happy to help and take the ongoing "enforcement" work > as part of the Program Manager's role if you don't want to stay on top > of this forever (although I'd probably do it once per release cycle, > which is still a big improvement on

Re: new packages review tickets

2020-05-26 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 08:33:14AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 4:03 AM Mattia Verga via devel > wrote: > > > Let me know if you agree (or disagree) with this proposal. > > I like it. Let me add my +1 too. (Actually, I had some doubts about the details, but I think taking

Re: new packages review tickets

2020-05-26 Thread Ben Cotton
On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 4:03 AM Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > Let me know if you agree (or disagree) with this proposal. I like it. I'm happy to help and take the ongoing "enforcement" work as part of the Program Manager's role if you don't want to stay on top of this forever (although I'd

Re: new packages review tickets

2020-05-25 Thread Dan Čermák
Hi Mattia, Mattia Verga via devel writes: > Hi all, > > now that we have new detailed statistics about new package review > tickets ( https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/ ) I would like > to make some cleanings... at the time I'm writing, there are 517 tickets > listed as new, many

Re: new packages review tickets

2020-05-24 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 08:02:09AM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > Hi all, > > now that we have new detailed statistics about new package review > tickets ( https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/ ) I would like > to make some cleanings... at the time I'm writing, there are 517

Re: new packages review tickets

2020-05-24 Thread Igor Raits
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Sun, 2020-05-24 at 08:02 +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > Hi all, Hey, > now that we have new detailed statistics about new package review > tickets ( https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/ ) I would > like > to make some

new packages review tickets

2020-05-24 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
Hi all, now that we have new detailed statistics about new package review tickets ( https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/ ) I would like to make some cleanings... at the time I'm writing, there are 517 tickets listed as new, many of them are older than 5 years! The first steps I