Thanks for all the comments and ideas you posted.
I have opened a pull request [1] to automate some of the processes
against review-stats. If accepted it will:
- Set NEEDINFO against submitter on tickets not assigned and not updated
for more than one year
- Set NEEDINFO against reviewer on tick
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 12:45:56PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> -1
> I had phase of life when I worked on these archaeologic tickets. I even
> managed to process eight years old ticket!
> Yes, for most tickets it was: Ping! Wait one month. Than one more gentle
> Ping! And if submitter does n
I'll apologize in advance for rambling, but I've been kicking around
ideas in this space for very many years now.
> "SJS" == Stephen John Smoogen writes:
SJS> Well it is quite clear we are doing something wrong and have been
SJS> for as long as the project has been going on.
It's true that
Il 28/05/20 19:04, Fabio Valentini ha scritto:
>
> Since bugzilla keeps track of which user set which flag, do you maybe
> need to specify which user's needinfo flag you want to clear?
>
> Fabio
>
I'm already passing all the flag object properties, id included:
>>> bug = bz.getbug(1730464)
>>> f
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 6:58 PM Mattia Verga via devel
wrote:
>
> Il 24/05/20 15:41, Igor Raits ha scritto:
> >
> > This is great idea! If you need any help with bugzilla API or anything
> > like that - let me know.
> >
> >
> Yeah, I think I need some help in getting flags resetted.
>
> I would li
Il 24/05/20 15:41, Igor Raits ha scritto:
>
> This is great idea! If you need any help with bugzilla API or anything
> like that - let me know.
>
>
Yeah, I think I need some help in getting flags resetted.
I would like to reset the 'needinfo' flag and the 'fedora-review' flag.
Accordingly to
htt
On Wed, 27 May 2020 at 10:35, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 12:45:56PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > It may sounds appealing to clean the plate and "resolve" a lot of
> > tickets. However, think about it from the other side: somebody is
> > waiting for review for
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 12:45:56PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> It may sounds appealing to clean the plate and "resolve" a lot of
> tickets. However, think about it from the other side: somebody is
> waiting for review for years, then a ping will come, and if he
> responds, then ... nothing. Just
Dne 24. 05. 20 v 10:02 Mattia Verga via devel napsal(a):
> - following the Policy for stalled package reviews [1], I would like to
> mass comment on tickets submitted before 1/1/2017 (more than 3 years
> old) asking the submitter if they're still interested in continue with
> the review process
Il 26/05/20 14:33, Ben Cotton ha scritto:
>
> I like it. I'm happy to help and take the ongoing "enforcement" work
> as part of the Program Manager's role if you don't want to stay on top
> of this forever (although I'd probably do it once per release cycle,
> which is still a big improvement on "o
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 08:33:14AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 4:03 AM Mattia Verga via devel
> wrote:
>
> > Let me know if you agree (or disagree) with this proposal.
>
> I like it.
Let me add my +1 too. (Actually, I had some doubts about the details,
but I think taking
On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 4:03 AM Mattia Verga via devel
wrote:
> Let me know if you agree (or disagree) with this proposal.
I like it. I'm happy to help and take the ongoing "enforcement" work
as part of the Program Manager's role if you don't want to stay on top
of this forever (although I'd pro
Hi Mattia,
Mattia Verga via devel writes:
> Hi all,
>
> now that we have new detailed statistics about new package review
> tickets ( https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/ ) I would like
> to make some cleanings... at the time I'm writing, there are 517 tickets
> listed as new, many
On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 08:02:09AM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> now that we have new detailed statistics about new package review
> tickets ( https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/ ) I would like
> to make some cleanings... at the time I'm writing, there are 517 tic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Sun, 2020-05-24 at 08:02 +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> Hi all,
Hey,
> now that we have new detailed statistics about new package review
> tickets ( https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/ ) I would
> like
> to make some cleaning
Hi all,
now that we have new detailed statistics about new package review
tickets ( https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/ ) I would like
to make some cleanings... at the time I'm writing, there are 517 tickets
listed as new, many of them are older than 5 years!
The first steps I would
16 matches
Mail list logo